UTILIZING GAMIFICATION IN MATHEMATICS COURSES FOR ENGINEERS TO PROMOTE

UTILIZING GAMIFICATION IN MATHEMATICS COURSES FOR ENGINEERS TO PROMOTE

T. Margalit, L. Rosenzweig, Y. Stanchescu, M. Gabel (2021).  UTILIZING GAMIFICATION IN MATHEMATICS COURSES FOR ENGINEERS TO PROMOTE . 12.

Studies have shown that gamification facilitates students’ interest, enjoyment and continuous involvement, allows students to make mistakes anonymously and triggers debates about answers, thus gamification increases students’ engagement. In addition, most students respond positively to using online quizzes during the lesson, the main criticism being the short time allowed for each question (Bullón et al., 2018). We examine two aspects of the use of Kahoot! online quizzes in three mathematics courses, taught to two groups of first year Israeli engineering students: (1) the effect of using Kahoot! quizzes on students’ learning outcomes in two questions of the mid-term exams (comparing between traditional teaching and teaching using Kahoot! quiz), and (2) students’ learning experience. Our findings indicate that in all three courses most of the students did not know how to solve the two questions, neither if the question was taught traditionally nor if it was discussed during the Kahoot! lesson. However, in one course (Algebra), students’ success was similar in the two groups, which may suggest that using the Kahoot! quiz was effective at least as the traditional teaching method. Overall, it is not currently clear whether using the Kahoot! quiz has effects on students’ achievements. Regarding students’ learning experience, our analysis demonstrates that students greatly favor using online quizzes as they feel it deepens their understanding and improves their ability to discuss the taught material. Moreover, the lecturers reported that the use of Kahoot! enabled them to review subjects that were taught in the course in an engaging and insightful way, caused a positive change in classroom dynamics and fostered a vivid classroom discussion, addressing issues that otherwise would have remained hidden.

Authors (New): 
Tamar Margalit
Lior Rosenzweig
Yonutz Stanchescu
Mika Gabel
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Tel Aviv Academic College of Engineering, Israel
Keywords: 
Active learning
Gamification
Tertiary Mathematics
Student's engagement
Kahoot!
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Alcock, L., & Simpson, A. (2009). Ideas from mathematics education: An introduction for mathematicians. Birmingham, UK: The Higher Education Academy: Maths, Stats and OR Research Networks.: 
Betts, K. (2009). Lost in Translation: Importance of Effective Communication in Online Education. Online Journal of Distance Education Administrators, 12(2). Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer122/betts122.html: 
Bullón, J.J., Encinas, A.H., Sánchez, M.J.S., & Martínez, V.G. (2018). Analysis of student feedback when using gamification tools in Math subjects. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (pp. 1818–1823).: 
Crouch, C.H., & Mazur E. (2001) Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970–977.: 
Cronhjort M., Filipsson L., Weurlander M. (2013). Can peer instruction in calculus improve student learning? In Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 1–9.: 
Dickerson, D. S., & Pitman, D. J. (2012). Advanced college-level students’ categorization and use of mathematical definitions. In T. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th conference of the international group or the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 2 (pp. 187-193). Taipei, Taiwan.: 
Dixson, M.D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10 (2), 1 – 13.: 
Holmes, J.B., Gee, E. R. (2016). A framework for understanding game-based teaching and learning. On the Horizon, 24(1), 1-16.: 
Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 9: 
10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8
Lithner, J. (2011) University Mathematics Students’ Learning Difficulties. Education Inquiry, 2(2), 289-303.: 
Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 159–167.: 
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.: 
Perdue, D. (2016). Increasing student engagement in math with online games and elements of game theory. In Adolphson, K. V. and Olson, T. A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning (pp. 149-157). Orlando, Florida.: 
Peters, M. Prince, M. (2019) Learning and Teaching Engineering Mathematics within an Active Learning Paradigm. In Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, June 25 – 27, 2019.: 
Selden, A. (2005) New developments and trends in tertiary mathematics education: or, more of the same? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(2-3), 131-147.: 
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 192–206.: 
Go to top
randomness