Using Facebook as a Supplementary Communication Channel for Active Learning

Using Facebook as a Supplementary Communication Channel for Active Learning

V. Truong, B. LE, T. NGUYEN (2016).  Using Facebook as a Supplementary Communication Channel for Active Learning. 12.

Active Learning as CDIO Standard No. 8 is all about engaging students in discussion, argumentation, interaction, and eventually, the creation of new ideas and concepts. Through Active Learning, students will not only learn more about the materials at hand, but also manage to figure out how they should structure their learning and what they should focus on to enhance their personal skills and knowledge. A key element to successful Active Learning, however, is the interaction channel between students, instructors and other stakeholders, who are involved in the teaching and learning process. While online communication channels are increasingly promoted at many universities and colleges so as to enhance Active Learning, the effectiveness of those channels, specifically for Active Learning, are usually left unmeasured or ignored in most studies. This paper, as a result, will attempt to measure the pros and cons of using one specific channel of Facebook for CDIO study groups. Specifically, Facebook sites have been set up for CDIO coursework at Duy Tan University with the purpose of: (1) Fostering neat and timely communication and interactions between CDIO team members, (2) Facilitating various brainstorming and design-thinking tactics for new idea development, (3) Collecting and comparing data on students’ postings and participation so as to propose an appropriate approach in the use of Facebook for CDIO teamwork, (4) Developing a data pool from Facebook interactions about different Active Learning tactics to be adopted effectively in specific CDIO-based courses. Measurements and comparisons between teams which used Facebook and teams that did not will be carried out to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of our new Facebook approach as opposed to the use of other communication channels. This study is supposed to be of interest to schools which are looking for ways to smoothen and fasten their Active Learning approach in their CDIO adoption.

Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016

Authors (New): 
Vu T Truong
Bao N LE
Thuan T NGUYEN
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Duy Tan University, Vietnam
Keywords: 
Active learning
brainstorming tactics
CDIO Project
communication channel
design-thinking social network
Facebook
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2016
Reference: 
ACM - Association for Computing Machinery (2001). Computing Curricula 2001 - Computer Science. National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0003263: December 2001. : 
Bosch, T. E. (2009). Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town. Communication, 35(2), 185-200. : 
Boyd, Danah M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.: 
CDIO™ Initiative (2016). http://www.cdio.org: 
IEEE Computing Society and Association for Computing Machinery (2004). Software Engineering 2004 - Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering. National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0003263: August 2004. : 
Lingard, R. W. (2010).Teaching and Assessing Teamwork Skills in Engineering & Computer Science. U.S.: Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics.: 
Mazer, J., Murphy, R., & Simonds, C. (2007). I’ll See You On “Facebook”: The Effects of ComputerMediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1-17. : 
Moe, N. B., Dingsøyr, T. and Røyrvik, E.A. (2009). Putting Agile Teamwork to the Test: A Preliminary Instrument for Empirically Assessing and Improving Agile Software Development. Business Information Processing, 31, pp. 114-123: 
Ophus, J. D., & Abbitt, J. T. (2009). Exploring the potential perceptions of social networking systems in university courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 639-648. : 
Pempek, T., Yermolayeva, Y., & Calvert, S. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227-238. : 
Roblyer, M., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. (2010). Findings on {Facebook} in Higher Education: A Comparison of College Faculty and Student Uses and Perceptions of SocialNetworking Sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134-140. : 
Sliger, Michele & Broderick, Stacia (2008). The Software Project Manager's Bridge to Agility. U.S.: Addison-Wesley. : 
Stutzman, F. (2006). An Evaluation of Identity-Sharing Behavior in Social Network Communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 14, 2006. : 
Todd, R. H. and Magleby, S. P. (2005). Elements of a Successful Capstone Course considering the Needs of Stakeholders. Europe: European Journal of Engineering Education 30 (2), pp. 203-214. : 
Uzun, A., Unal, E. & Karatas, S. (2014). Using Facebook as a Supplementary tool in Education. World Journal on Educational Technology, Vol. 6, Iss. 1. http://www.world-educationcenter.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/2775/pdf_266: 
Wang, Q., Woo, H. L., Quek, C. L., Yang, Y., & Liu, M. (2012). Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(3), 428-438. : 
Go to top
randomness