SYSTEMS THINKING IN A MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM

B. Oskarsson, M. Huge-Brodin, J. Hallström (2022). SYSTEMS THINKING IN A MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM. 209-219.

2022 18th International CDIO Conference, Reykjavik University, Iceland

In engineering programs, systems thinking capability has been promoted for a long time. The capability of students to apply various systems thinking approaches is not only supported by educational staff, but also highly required by various employers. The aim of the study is to investigate the inclusion of systems thinking aspects in the Mechanical Engineering program at Linköping University. Two research questions address this aim. According to involved teachers, (1) What aspects of systems thinking are included in the Master Program in Mechanical Engineering?, and (2) What teaching and learning activities concerning systems thinking are included in the Master Program in Mechanical Engineering? Empirical data was gathered through focus group interviews with involved teachers from two Master profiles. The results indicate that systems thinking is present in the respective Master profiles, however not explicitly communicated with the students. Systems thinking is often coupled with disciplinary knowledge, which supports CDIO standard 3. Some examples of how systems thinking is taught relating to disciplinary knowledge (CDIO standard 7) were presented by the teachers. Examples of teaching activities specifically aimed at systems thinking were however missing, alongside examination of systems thinking in particular.

Authors (New):

Björn Oskarsson

Maria Huge-Brodin

Jonas Hallström

Pages:

209-219

Keywords:

systems thinking

Teaching and learning activities

Master profiles

Applied Mechanics

mechatronics

CDIO Standard 3

CDIO Standard 7

Year:

2022

Reference:

Arbesman, S. (2017). Overcomplicated: Technology at the limits of comprehension. New York: Portfolio.:

Booth Sweeney, L. & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics: Initial results of a systems thinking inventory. System Dynamics Review, 16(4), 249−286.:

Booth Sweeney, L., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23(2/3), 285–312.:

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.:

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.:

Dahlin Ivanoff, S., & Holmgren, K. (2017). Fokusgrupper: Studentlitteratur.:

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.:

Elsawah, S., Ho, A. T. L., & Ryan, M. J. (2022). Teaching Systems Thinking in Higher Education. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 22(2), 66-102.:

Engström, S. & Svensson, M. (2022). An educational model for teaching about technological systems. In J. Hallström & P. J. Williams (Eds.), Teaching and Learning about Technological Systems: Philosophical, Curriculum and Classroom Perspectives. Springer Singapore.:

Finfgeld-Connett, D. (2014). Use of Content Analysis to Conduct Knowledge-Building and Theory- Generating Qualitative Systematic Reviews. Qualitative Research, 14(3), 341-352.:

Hallström, J., & Klasander, C. (2020). Making the Invisible Visible: Pedagogies Related to Teaching and Learning about Technological Systems. In P. J. Williams & D. Barlex (Eds.), Pedagogy for Technology Education in Secondary Schools: Research Informed Perspectives for Classroom Teachers (pp. 65-82). Cham: Springer.:

Hallström, J. (2022). Teaching and Learning about Technological Systems: A Research Synthesis. In J. Hallström & P. J. Williams (Eds.), Teaching and Learning about Technological Systems: Philosophical, Curriculum and Classroom Perspectives. Springer Singapore.:

Ho, F. M. (2019). Turning challenges into opportunities for promoting systems thinking through chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2764-2776.:

Ingelstam, L. (2012). System - att tänka över samhälle och teknik. Stockholm: Energimyndigheten.:

Jackson, A., & Hurst, G. A. (2021). Faculty Perspectives Regarding the Integration of Systems Thinking into Chemistry Education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(4), 855-865.:

Klasander, C. (2010). Talet om tekniska system. Förväntningar, traditioner och skolverkligheter. Norrköping: Linköpings universitet.:

Oskarsson, B. (2019). Total Cost Analysis in Logistics: Practical Execution, Learning, and Teaching in Higher Education (Vol. 2032). Linköping University Electronic Press.:

Rosenkränzer, F., Kramer, T., Hörsch, C., Schuler, S., & Riess, W. (2016). Promoting Student Teachers’ Content Related Knowledge in Teaching Systems Thinking: Measuring Effects of an Intervention through Evaluating a Videotaped Lesson. Higher Education Studies, 6(4), 156-169.:

Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. Stockholm.:

Wibeck, V., Dahlgren, E. M., & Öberg, A. G. (2007). Learning in Focus Groups: An Analytical Dimension for Enhancing Focus Group Research. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 249-267.:

on October 11, 2022 - 05:11 Maria Siiskonen

SYSTEMS THINKING IN A MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM

Navigation

SYSTEMS THINKING IN A MECHANICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM

Share this content.