Lab training is a key element in most engineering education programs in preparation for engineering profession tasks. Universities worldwide are exploring new possibilities and different forms to arrange online and blended labs as an alternative to pure campus training. This study compares online and blended lab setups in four cases of engineering education at European technical universities. The results show that online and blended labs can achieve similar learning outcomes, with blended labs being particularly effective in combining online learning with hands-on elements. Students reported high levels of satisfaction and teachers noted the benefits of online learning environments, but common challenges included ensuring student engagement, increased self-regulation requirements, and the high effort needed to design online or blended environments. The study provides course design guidelines and discusses implications for future research and implementation in universities worldwide.
Pages:
805-819
Affiliations:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Hamburg University of Applied Sciences
Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Keywords:
Online learning
Online labs
Hybrid labs
Remote labs
Blended Learning
Hybrid teaching
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 8
Year:
2023
Reference:
Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning Outcome Achievement in Non-traditional (Virtual and Remote) versus Traditional (Hands-on) Laboratories: A Review of the Empirical Research. Computers & Education, 87, 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003 :
Chen, X., Song, G., & Zhang, Y. (2010). Virtual and Remote Laboratory Development: A review. In Earth and Space 2010: Engineering, Science, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments, 3843–3852. :
Corter, J. E., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Process and Learning Outcomes from Remotely-operated, Simulated, and Hands-on Student Laboratories. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2054–2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.009 :
Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Im, S., & Ma, J. (2007). Constructing Reality: A study of Remote, Hands-on, and Simulated Laboratories. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 14(2), 7-es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1275511.1275513 :
de Jong, T., Sotiriou, S., & Gillet, D. (2014). Innovations in STEM Education: The Go-Lab Federation of Online Labs. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0003-6 :
Enneking, K. M., Breitenstein, G. R., Coleman, A. F., Reeves, J. H., Wang, Y., & Grove, N. P. (2019). The Evaluation of a Hybrid, General Chemistry Laboratory Curriculum: Impact on Students’ Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1058–1067. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00637 :
Gamage, K. A. A., Wijesuriya, D. I., Ekanayake, S. Y., Rennie, A. E. W., Lambert, C. G., & Gunawardhana, N. (2020). Online Delivery of Teaching and Laboratory Practices: Continuity of University Programmes during COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(10), 291. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100291:
Goodrick, D. (2014). Comparative Case Studies, Methodological Briefs: Impact Evaluation 9, UNICEF Office of Research, Florence.:
Graham, R. (2018). The Global State of the Art in Engineering Education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT): Cambridge, MA, USA. https://www.rhgraham.org/resources/Phase-1-engineering-education-benchmarking-study-2017.pdf :
Graham, R. (2022). Crisis and catalyst: The impact of COVID-19 on global practice in engineering education. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT): Cambridge, MA, USA.:
Henke, K., Ostendorff, St., Wuttke, H.-D., & Simon, St. (2013). Fields of Applications for Hybrid Online Labs. 2013 10th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2013.6502899 :
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-first Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106 :
Lei, Z., Zhou, H., Hu, W., Deng, Q., Zhou, D., Liu, Z.-W., & Lai, J. (2018). Modular Web-Based Interactive Hybrid Laboratory Framework for Research and Education. IEEE Access, 6, 20152–20163. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2821713 :
Lynch, T., & Ghergulescu, I. (2017). Review of Virtual Labs as the Emerging Technologies for Teaching STEM subjects. Proceedings of the 11th INTED conference, 6082–6091. :
Nedic, Z., Machotka, J., & Nafalski, A. (2003). Remote Laboratories versus Virtual and Real Laboratories. 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003., 1, T3E-T3E. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2003.1263343 :
Olesen, V., Stöhr, C., Enelund, M., & Malmqvist, J. (2022). Learning Mechatronics Using Digital Live Labs. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, 831–847. :
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and Engineering: A Review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002 :
Post, L. S., Guo, P., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2019). Effects of Remote Labs on Cognitive, Behavioral, and Affective Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. Computers & Education, 140, 103596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103596 :
Rodriguez-Gil, L., García-Zubia, J., Orduña, P., & López-de-Ipiña, D. (2017). Towards New Multiplatform Hybrid Online Laboratory Models. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 10(3), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2591953 :
Scheckler, R. K. (2003). Virtual labs: A Substitute for Traditional Labs? International Journal of Developmental Biology, 47(2–3), 231–236.:
Sicker, D. C., Lookabaugh, T., Santos, J., & Barnes, F. (2005). Assessing the Effectiveness of Remote Networking Laboratories. Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, S3F-S3F. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612279 :
Stöhr, C., Demazière, C., & Adawi, T. (2020). The Polarizing Effect of the Online Flipped Classroom. Computers & Education, 147, 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103789 :
Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A Study on the Effects of Model-based Inquiry Pedagogy on Students’ Inquiry Skills in a Virtual Physics Lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043 :
Zhu, J. (2010). A Hybrid Online-education Strategy for Delivering Engineering and Technology Courses. 2010 International Conference on Networking and Digital Society, 2, 448–451. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNDS.2010.5479464 :
on November 27, 2023 - 05:19 frebyst
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
