IMPROVING STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT WITH ACTIVE LEARNING IN ENGINEERING OPTIMISATION LECTURES

IMPROVING STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT WITH ACTIVE LEARNING IN ENGINEERING OPTIMISATION LECTURES

G. Asbjörnsson, K. Bhadani (2021).  IMPROVING STUDENTS ENGAGEMENT WITH ACTIVE LEARNING IN ENGINEERING OPTIMISATION LECTURES. 11.

In optimisation, as for learning, the synthesises of previous knowledge and current information
is essential to achieve defined objectives. The students' objectives are to fulfil the course's
intended learning outcomes and possibly, at the same time, develop their knowledge, skills,
and attitudes within the subject. The purpose of this work is to incorporate a more collaborative
learning environment with active learning activities in the classroom to improve student
learning opportunities, their perception of the course and their interest in the subject of
optimisation. Within the CDIO initiative, active learning or experiential learning is stated as a
key factor in engaging students directly in thinking and problem-solving activities. This can
apply to different teaching activities such as assignments, lectures, and assessments. With
active learning, the purpose is to involve students more actively in the learning process instead
of relying on passive information transfer. Active learning methods aim to facilitate the students'
process of creating their understanding of the topic by reflecting, questioning, conjecturing,
evaluating and make connections between ideas whilst drawing on ideas, experiences and
knowledge of others. In this work, diverse activities for incorporating more interactive learning
in the classroom have been implemented in different course lectures, activities such as thinkpair-
share, mind maps, multiple-choice questions, incomplete hands and more. An evaluation
of the students' perception of the course and the various activities was carried out at the end
of the course. The most considerable improvement was with the overall impression of teaching.
That improved between the years from 3.10 to 3.57. The most appreciated activity was the
think-pair-share approach, which gave the students a cognitive break from the lecture slides
to discuss the topic. However, the response rate was limited but did indicate the students'
perspective and what was appreciated. The results will provide a good base for future
development.

Authors (New): 
Gauti Asbjörnsson
Kanishk Bhadani
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
Optimisation
Engineering lectures
Active learning
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Avison, D. E., Lau, F., Myers, M. D., & Nielsen, P. A. (1999). Action research. Communications of the ACM, 42(1), 94-97.: 
Bhadani, K., Stöhr,C., Hulthén, E., Quist, J., Bengtsson, M., Evertsson, M. and Malmqvist, J. (2017). Students Perspectives on Video-Based Learning in CDIO-Based Project Courses. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, Canada.: 
Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5(1), 7-74.: 
Shute, V.J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.: 
Cooper, J. & Robinson, P. (2000). Getting Started: Informal Small-Group Strategies in Large Classes. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 2000(81), 17-24.: 
Felder, R.M. and Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide (1st ed.). San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass.: 
Hall, S. R., Waitz, I., Broadeur, D.R., Soderholm, D.H. and Nasr, R. (2002). Adoptation of Active Learning in Lecture-Based Engineering Class. Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston, USA.: 
Hockings, C., Cooke, S., Yamashita, H., McGinty, S. and Bowl, M. (2008). Switched off? A study on disengagement among computing students at two universities. Education, 23(2), 191-201.: 
Malmqvist, J., Knutson, M., Lundqvist, U., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Astrup, T. F., Vigild, M., Hussman, P. M., Grom, A., Lyng, R., Gunnarsson, S., Huay, H. L.-W. K. and Kamp A. (2019). Towards CDIO Standards 3.0. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark.: 
Norton, L. (2019). Action Research in Teaching and Learning - A Practical Guide to Conduct Pedagogical Research in University (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Routledge.: 
Papalambros, P. Y. and Wilde, D. J. (2017). Principle of Optimal Design - Modelling and Computation (3rd ed.). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.: 
Quist, J., Bhadani, K., Bengtsson, M., Evertsson, M., Malmqvist, J., Enelund M. and Hoffenson, S. (2017). CDIO Based Engineering Design and Optimization Course. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, Canada.: 
Rao, R. V., Savsani, V.J. and Vakharia, D.P. (2011). Teaching–learning-based optimisation: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimisation problems. Computer-Aided Design, 43(3), 303-315.: 
Rodríguez, M., Díaz, I., Gonzalez, E.J. and González-Miquel, M. (2018). Motivational active learning: An integrated approach to teaching and learning process control. Education for Chemical Engineers, 24, 8-13.: 
Smith, K. (2000). Going Deeper: Formal Small-Group Learning in Large Classes. New Direction for Teaching and Learning, 2000(81), 25-46.: 
Wieman, C. (2007). Why Not Try: A Scientific Approach to Science Education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 39(5): 9-15.: 
Zepke, N. and Leach, L. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten Proposals for action. Active learning in Higher Education, 11(3): 167-177.: 
Go to top
randomness