EXPERIENCES FROM USING OPEN-ENDED AND LIFE-RESEMBLING PROBLEMS IN A MASTER COURSE

EXPERIENCES FROM USING OPEN-ENDED AND LIFE-RESEMBLING PROBLEMS IN A MASTER COURSE

M. Kans (2015).  EXPERIENCES FROM USING OPEN-ENDED AND LIFE-RESEMBLING PROBLEMS IN A MASTER COURSE. 14.

Finding the optimum balance between theory and practice is one of the major challenges in higher education, especially on master level. A student-centered approach to learning is argued for by several educational researchers and practitioners. Deep learning could be accomplished by activating the students during the education. This paper reports on experiences learned from a course in Maintenance Data Management, which is thought on the first year on the master’s program, and in specific on how knowledge and skills in computerized maintenance management systems were trained. The course consisted of a series of lectures, laboratory sessions, exercises and seminars. In addition, two study visits and one guest lecture were arranged. In this paper one of the activities is described in more depth. The activity is an exercise in IT system selection, where the students are asked to define functional and non-functional criteria for the evaluation of systems alternatives, to find suitable candidates for evaluation and finally conduct an evaluation and discuss the results. This exercise exemplifies ways to create more open-ended and real-life resembling problems that activates the student in the learning situation.

Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, China, June 8-11 2015

Authors (New): 
Mirka Kans
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Linnaeus University, Sweden
Keywords: 
Student active learning
real-life resembling learning situations
master level course
methods for IT systems requirement determination and selection
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2015
Reference: 
Castles, R., Lohani, V.K., and Kachroo, P. (2009). Utilizing hands-on learning to facilitate progression through Bloom’s taxonomy within the first semester. Proc. of the 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference W1F-1 October 18 - 21, 2009, San Antonio, TX. : 
CDIO [online] http://www.cdio.org/se/index.html, accessed 2011-09-28. : 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Lucas, W. A. and Brodeur, D. R. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2.0 An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20 – 23, 2011 : 
Macdonald, A.S., and Scott, B.F. (1994). Creating an integrated learning environment. Experiences in product design engineering education. Proc. of the IEE Colloquium on Design Education - Bridging the Gap Between Industrial and Engineering Design, 6/1-6/4. : 
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education 2d ed., RoutledgeFalmer, USA. : 
Swedish national Agency for Higher Education (1992). Högskoleförordningen [Higher educational regulation]. : 
Tynjälä, P., Salminen, R.T., Sutela, T., Nuutinen, A., and Pitkänen, S. (2005). Factors related to study success in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 221–31. : 
University of Victoria [online], http://www.coun.uvic.ca/learning/exams/blooms-taxonomy.html, accessed 2011-12-18.: 
Yorke, M., and Knight, P. (2007). Evidence-informed pedagogy and the enhancement of student employability. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(2), 157–71. : 
Go to top