EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A PHD THESIS WITH A CDIO THEME

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A PHD THESIS WITH A CDIO THEME

K. Edström (2018).  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A PHD THESIS WITH A CDIO THEME. 18.

In December 2017, the author defended the doctoral thesis titled “Exploring the dual nature of engineering education: Opportunities and challenges in integrating the academic and professional aspects in the curriculum”. In this paper, the thesis is summarised with the interests of the CDIO community in mind, providing guidance for those who might want to read selected parts. In the title, the term dual nature suggests that engineering education is both academic, emphasising theory in a range of subjects, and professional, preparing students for engineering practice. Ideally, these aspects are also in a meaningful relationship in the curriculum. However, this duality is also a source of tensions. This is the theme, explored in the context of engineering education development, in particular the CDIO approach. First, micro-cases on programme and course level illustrate how the dual nature ideal is pursued in the integrated curriculum. This is followed by two critical accounts, which suggest widening the perspective from curriculum development per se, to the organisational conditions. The first is a historical excursion, comparing the views of Carl Richard Söderberg (1895-1979) with CDIO, showing significant similarities in ideals, arguments, and strategies. The second is an effort to make sense of experiences of unsustainable change, resulting in a model, called “organisational gravity”, used to explain the stability of programmes. As an implication, two change strategies are suggested, with different availability, risks, resource demands, and sustainability of results. Finally, the tensions between the academic and professional aspects are located in the university organisation. Refuting a rationalist view, the institutional logics perspective is used to analyse the tensions within engineering education. It is suggested that the logics of the academic profession dominates over the logics of the engineering profession, hence favouring “teaching theory” over “teaching professionals”. The integrated curriculum strategy depends on educators’ ability to unite theoretical and professional aspects in courses, and on the collegial capacity for coordination. 

Authors (New): 
Kristina Edström
Pages: 
18
Affiliations: 
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords: 
professional education
dual nature
engineering education development
The CDIO Initiative
PBL
engineering education research
Carl Richard Söderberg
organisational gravity
institutional logics
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Barnett, R. (1992). Improving Higher Education: Total Quality Care. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.: 
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.: 
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered : priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.: 
Brooks, H. (1967). Applied Research, Definitions, Concepts, Themes Applied science and technological progress: A report to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives (pp. 21-55). Washington, DC.: National Academy of Sciences.: 
Crawley, E. F. (2001). The CDIO Syllabus: A statement of goals for undergraduate engineering education (CDIO Report #1). Cambridge, MA.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing.: 
Dahler-Larsen, P. (1998). Den rituelle reflektion - om evaluering i organisationer [The ritual reflection - on evaluation in organisations]. Odense: Syddansk universitetsforlag.: 
Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). London: Sage.: 
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147-160. : 
Edström, K. (2011). Organisationens gravitation – om uthållighet i utveckling av utbildning [Organizational Gravity - on sustainability in educational development]. Paper presented at the Att leda högre utbildning [Leading Higher Education], Sveriges universitets- och högskoleförbund (SUHF), 14- 15 november 2011, Karolinska Institutet. : 
Edström, K. (2017a). Exploring the dual nature of engineering education: Opportunities and challenges in integrating the academic and professional aspects in the curriculum. (PhD), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. : 
Edström, K. (2017b). The role of CDIO in engineering education research: combining usefulness and scholarliness. European Journal of Engineering Education.: 
Edström, K. (2018). Academic and Professional Values in Engineering Education: Engaging with History to Explore a Persistent Tension. Engineering Studies, 10(1). : 
Edström, K., El Gaidi, K., Hallström, S., & Kuttenkeuler, J. (2005). Integrated assessment of disciplinary, personal and interpersonal skills-student perceptions of a novel learning experience Proceedings of the13th Improving Student Learning Conference. Oxford: OCSLD.: 
Edström, K., Hallström, S., & Kuttenkeuler, J. (2011). Mini workshop—Designing project-based courses for learning and cost-effective teaching. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2011.: 
Edström, K., & Hellström, P.-E. (forthcoming). Improving student learning in STEM education: Promoting a deep approach to problem-solving. : 
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539-555. : 
10.1080/03043797.2014.895703
Enelund, M., Knutson Wedel, M., Lundqvist, U., & Malmqvist, J. (2013). Integration of education for sustainable development in the mechanical engineering curriculum. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 19(1), 51-62. : 
Enelund, M., Larsson, S., & Malmqvist, J. (2011). Integration of Computational Mathematics Education in the Mechanical Engineering Curriculum. Paper presented at the The 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark. : 
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In P. J. DiMaggio, & Powell, W. W. (Ed.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.: 
Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer Press: 
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.: 
Graham, R. (2015). Does Teaching Advance Your Academic Career?: Perspectives of Promotion Procedures in UK Higher Education. London: Royal Academy of Engineering 2.: 
Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., & Edström, K. (2007). The route towards a sustainable design-implement course. Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. : 
Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., Niewoehner, R., & Young, P. W. (2014). Design-Implement Experiences and Engineering Workspaces. In E. F. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Östlund, D. R. Brodeur, & K. Edström (Eds.), Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. 2nd Ed. (pp. 117-142). Cham: Springer.: 
Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher education, 49(1-2), 155-176. : 
Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2016). Where is the engineering I applied for? A longitudinal study of students' transition into higher education engineering, and their considerations of staying or leaving. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(2), 154-171. : 
Holmegaard, H. T., Ulriksen, L., & Madsen, L. M. (2010). Why students choose (not) to study engineering. Paper presented at the Proc. of the Joint International IGIP-SEFI Annual Conference.: 
Kuttenkeuler, J. (2017). Student project videos: Evolo, Infernus, Solar Power Aircraft. Stockholm: KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.kth.se/profile/jakob/page/evolo: 
Malmqvist, J., Bankel, J., Enelund, M., Gustafsson, G., & Knutson Wedel, M. (2010). Ten Years of CDIO - Experiences from a Long-term Education Development Process Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference. École Polytechnique de Montréal, Québec, Canada.: 
Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015). A survey of CDIO implementation globally–effects on educational quality. Paper presented at the Proc. 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, PR China.: 
MIT. (1949). Committee on Educational Survey. Report to the Faculty of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (The Lewis Report). Cambridge, MA.: Technology Press.: 
Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.: 
NSF. (2013). Theodore von Kármán (1881-1963), National Medal of Science 50th Anniversary. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/news/special_reports/medalofscience50/vonkarman.jsp: 
Picon, A. (2004). Engineers and engineering history: Problems and perspectives. History and Technology, 20(4), 421-436. : 
Seely, B. (2005). Patterns in the history of engineering education reform: A brief essay Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century (pp. 114-130). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.: 
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.: 
Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99-129). Thousand Oaks: Sage.: 
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.: 
Williams, R. (2002). Retooling: A historian confronts technological change. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.: 
Go to top