EVALUATION OF SPIRAL CURRICULUM FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING USING CDIO FRAMEWORK

EVALUATION OF SPIRAL CURRICULUM FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING USING CDIO FRAMEWORK

K. Yang, S. CHEAH, S. PHUA (2021).  EVALUATION OF SPIRAL CURRICULUM FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERING USING CDIO FRAMEWORK. 13.

This paper shares the experience of the Diploma in Chemical Engineering (DCHE) of Singapore Polytechnic (SP) in using the CDIO Framework to guide the design of spiral curriculum for chemical engineering students. In this spiral curriculum model, simple concepts are introduced to the students first, which are then revisited and re-construed in a more in-depth and elaborated manner throughout the three-year course. The CDIO learning outcomes are intertwine into the context of learning to support the levelling up of knowledge and skills from one semester to another, from one module to another, while integrating critical thinking skills with disciplinary knowledge to provide a more holistic approach to engineering education for our students. The paper first introduces spiral curriculum for chemical engineering and explains how the modules are sequenced within the three-year course based on the complexity of concepts, context of learning as well as opportunities for application and integration of knowledge. Then, it describes the use of block teaching as a means to deliver the spiral curriculum where knowledge and skill competencies are levelled up via a cluster of modules offered within a semester. DCHE had two runs of block teaching and the third run is currently in-effect. Qualitative and quantitative surveys were carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of block teaching on student learning and student performance in assessment across different cohort of students in the first two runs. A z-test was used to compare student academic performance at 5% significance level and statistically there are no significance difference. It was found that generally student were able to connect the concepts taught from one module to another better compared to a non-spiral curriculum. Some improvement plans had been implemented based on the feedback of the first two runs and these are discussed in the paper. Faculty teaching staff who facilitate the learning with students also plays an instrumental role in the spiral curriculum where they must have the ability to provide the integrated learning experiences to students and help students make connections between the concepts that are taught in different modules and across semesters. So, it is important that faculty members are able to deliver more than one subject or area of study. While there are benefits for using block teaching to aid student learning, there are challenges and trade-offs which are further discussed in the paper. In the last section of the paper, it outlines the broad areas where we strive to continue to study the effect of block teaching in future cohort of students to improve the delivery of the spiral curriculum and support student learning.

Authors (New): 
Katerina Yang
Sin-Moh CHEAH
Siew Teng PHUA
Pages: 
13
Affiliations: 
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
Chemical Engineering
Spiral Curriculum
Block Teaching
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Brauer, D. G., & Ferguson, K. J. (2015). The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 96. Medical teacher, 37(4), pp.312-322: 
Bruner, J.S. (1960). The Process of Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA: 
Cheah, S.M. (2009). Integrating CDIO Skills in a Core Chemical Engineering Module: A Case Study, Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference, June 8-10; Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore: 
Cheah, S.M. (2009). Using CDIO to Revamp the Chemical Engineering Curriculum, Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference, June 8-10; Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore: 
Cheah, S.M., Phua, S.T. & Ng, C.H.T. (2013). The Chemical Engineering CDIO Experience After 5 Years of Implementation, Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, June 9-13; Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Havard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts: 
Cheah, S.M. & Wong, Y. (2019). Using Workplace Learning for Developing Faculty CDIO Competency in Supporting a Spiral Curriculum, Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, June 24-28; Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark: 
Cheah, S.M. & Yang, K. (2018). CDIO Framework and SkillsFuture: Redesign of Chemical Engineering Curriculum after 10 Years of Implementing CDIO, Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, June 28 – July 2; Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan: 
Coelho, C., & Moles, D. (2015). Student Perceptions of a Spiral Curriculum, European Journal of Dental Education, Vol.20(3), pp.161-166: 
Collura, M.A., Aliane, B., Daniels, S., & Nocito-Gobel, J. (2004). Development of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Foundation Spiral, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, June 20-23; Salt Lake City, Utah.: 
Cowan, P., Morrison, H., & McBride, F. (1998). Evidence of a Spiral Curriculum Using a Mathematical Problem-Solving Tool, Interactive Learning Environments, 6:3, pp.205-224: 
DiBiasio, D., Clark, W.M., Dixon, A.G., Comparini, L., & O'Connor, K. (1999). Evaluation of a Spiral Curriculum for Engineering, 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 10-13; San Juan, Puerto Rico: 
Fraser, S., Wright, A.D., van Donkelaar, P., & Smirl, J.D. (2019). Cross-sectional Comparison of Spiral versus Block Integrated Curriculums in Preparing Medical Students to Diagnose and Manage Concussions, BMC Medical Education, 19:17: 
Gomes, V.G., Barton, G.W., Petrie, J.G., Romagnoli, J., Holt, P., Abbas, A., Cohen, B., Harris, A.T., Haynes, B.S., Langrish, A.G., Orellana, J., See, H.T., Valix, M., & White, D. (2006). Chemical Engineering Curriculum Renewal, Education for Chemical Engineers, Vol 1(1), pp.116-125: 
Grove, N.P., Hershberger, J.W., & Bretz, S.L. (2008). Impact of a Spiral Organic Curriculum on Student Attrition and Learning, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, pp.157-162: 
Gupta, V. K., Joseph, B., Alcantar, N., Toomey, R. & Sunol, A. (2008). A Spiral Curriculum for Chemical Engineering, Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Meeting of AIChE, November 15-21; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: 
Harden, R.M., & Stamper, N. (1999). What is a Spiral Curriculum? Medical Teacher, 21(2), pp.141-143: 
Hazel Mae, L., & Alegre, E. M. (2019). The Level of Impact on Spiral Progression Approach in Mathematics to the Academic Performance of the Grade 10 Students. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Vol. 9, Issue 4, pp.504-512: 
Herrick, R.J., Jacob, J.M., & Richardson, J.J. (2003). Retention Through a Coordinated Spiral Curriculum, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, June 20-22; Nashville, Tennessee: 
Masters, K., & Gibbs, T. (2007). The spiral curriculum: implications for online learning. BMC Medical Education, 7(1), 52.: 
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2007). Mathematics Syllabus Primary.: 
Neumann, Y., Neumann, E., & Lewis, S. (2017). The Robust Learning Model with a Spiral Curriculum: Implications for the Educational Effectiveness of Online Master Degree Programs. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 10(2), pp.95-108: 
Ovadia-Blechman, Z., Muller, I. & Naftali, S. (2016). Medical Engineering Education based on the Spiral Approach, iJEP ‒ Volume 6, Issue 3: 
Sale, D. & Cheah, S.M. (2011). Developing Critical Thinking Skills Through Dynamic Simulation Using an Explicit Model of Thinking, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, June 20-23; Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen: 
Sheppard, S.D., Kelly Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W.M. (2008). Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Jossey-Bass: 
Go to top
randomness