Designing a Comprehensive Methodology to Integrate Sustainability Issues in CDIO Projects

Designing a Comprehensive Methodology to Integrate Sustainability Issues in CDIO Projects

Designing a comprehensive methodology to integrate sustainability issues in CDIO projects The global agenda of sustainability is increasingly demanding the acquisition of technical skills and the development of specific personal competences of future professionals. This fact is encouraging the instructors of engineering schools to develop new and innovative learning strategies that cope with this challenge. A historical review of how the topic has been included in engineering curricula in the last decades shows that the focus has been primarily put on economic and environmental aspects, while the ethical and social impacts have been considered to a lesser extent. We therefore propose in this study a new methodology to overcome this situation, since we understand that all the sustainability domains should be addressed jointly and in an integrated way. In the context of CDIO projects, the development of course contents, applied methodologies and evaluation rubrics is usually dissymmetric. Life-cycle assessment methodology usually fits well to CDIO model when the challenge is to design, implement and operate a range of specific products, but in the case of more complex systems or processes, an adaptation is required in order to enhance in the students a broader and more strategic vision. Additionally, the definition of social value and the measurement of social impacts are issues not yet sufficiently clear both in the academic and practical fields, while the quantification of the social footprint appears not to be appropriate in CDIO scope. The pilot methodology we present was implemented in the course 2014-15 in “INGENIA”, a 12 ECTS compulsory subject taught in the first year of the Master in Industrial Engineering of the Technical University of Madrid. Working by groups, students developed concepts of products or system such as mechanical and electronic and bioengineering devices, drones, electricity market, etc. With the purpose of integrating sustainability criteria in their prototypes, several workshops were held in which not only the economic, social and environmental impacts were analysed but the strategical, long-term vision, stakeholders’ needs and ethical aspects as well. Using the ABET competences framework, ex-ante and ex-post evaluations were conducted in order to assess how the students strengthened personal outcomes related to sustainability (ABET competences (c), (f) and (h)). In this sense, the study shows significant improvement in many aspects of environmental, social and ethical dimensions. Moreover, since we continue developing and improving the pilot methodology in 2015-16, we also introduce in the paper more practical guidelines that we are addressing to the students by means of taking into account various approaches in particular socio-economic contexts or to differentiate specificities by industrial sectors or activity fields.

Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016

Authors (New): 
Rafael Miñano-Rubio
Ana Moreno Romero
Julio Lumbreras
Ángel Uruburu
Ruth Carrasco-Gallego
Rafael Borge
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Spain
Keywords: 
Sustainability
Social Responsibility
Professional Responsibility
Ethics
Project-based courses
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2016-01-01 00:00:00
Reference: 
Augusto, H., Ramírez, P., Poblete, P. & Vargas, X. (2012). Ethics Learning Outcome: An Integrated Learning Experience. In Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane.: 
Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP).Available at http://www.unep.org/pdf/DTIE_PDFS/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf: 
Benoît-Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S, Vickery-Niederman G, Franze J, Azuero L, Ciroth A, Mazijn B, Aulisio D (2013).The methodological sheets for subcategories in the social life cycle assessment (SLCA), Pre-publication version, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and SETAC. Available at http://www.lifecycleinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/SLCA_methodological_sheets_11.11.13.pdf: 
Borge, R., Lumbreras, J., Rodríguez, M.E. & Pinto, G. (2011). Development of innovation teaching activities for the course "Environmental Engineering" of the new degree on Industrial Engineering Technologies at UPM. INTED2011 – International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Valencia (Spain), pp. 005801-005807.: 
ISBN 978-84-614-7423-3
Brey, P. A. (2012). Anticipating ethical issues in emerging IT. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 305-317.: 
Brodeur, D. 2013, Mentoring young adults in the development of social responsibility. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 13-25.: 
CDIO (2011). The CDIO Syllabus 2.0. Available at: http://www.cdio.org/framework-benefits/cdiosyllabus: 
Cheah, S.M. (2014). CDIO as curriculum model for education for sustainable development. Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, June 16-19, 2014.: 
Chua, P. H., & Cheah, S. M. (2013). Education for Sustainable Development using Design Thinking and Appropriate Technology. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.: 
Crawley, E., Cha, J., Malmqvist, J., & Brodeur, D. (2008). The context of engineering education. Proceedings of the 4th International CDIO Conference. Gent, Belgium, June 16-19, 2008.: 
Cummings, M.L. (2006), Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach, Science and Engineering Ethics 12 , 701-715, vol. 12, pp. 701-715: 
Curran, M.A. (Ed) (1996). Environmental Life Cycle Assessment.: 
ISBN 0-07-015063-X
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line in 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford. : 
Enelund, M., Wedel, M.K., Lundqvist, U. & Malmqvist, J. (2012). Integration of education for sustainable development in a mechanical engineering programme. Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, July 1 - 4, 2012: 
Hussmann, P.M., Trandum, C. & Vigild, M.E. (2010). How to Include Sustainability in Engineering Education? – The “Green Challenge” at DTU is one way. Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18, 2010: 
Jeswiet, J., Duflou, J., Dewulf, W., Luttropp, C. & Hauschild, M. (2005). A Curriculum for Life Cycle Engineering Design for the Environment. Proceedings of the 1st International CDIO Conference, Kingston, Canada, 2005. : 
Lumbreras, J., Moreno, A., Díaz-Lantada, A., García, A., Hernández, A., García, C., de Juanes, J., García, A.M., García, O., Rossi, C. & Mínguez, E. (2015). The INGENIA initiative: a multidisciplinary set of subjects for promoting the CDIO methodology in a Master’s degree in Industrial Engineering. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China, June 8-11, 2015.: 
Malheiro, B., Silva, M., Ferreira, P. & Guedes, P. (2015). CDIO and the European Project Semester: A match for capstone projects? Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China, June 8-11, 2015.: 
Palm, E. & Hansson, S.O. (2006). The Case for Ethical Technology Assessment (eTA), Technological Forecasting and Social Change 73, 543–558.: 
Palm, E. & Törnqvist, E. (2015). How to integrate ethical aspects in a technical project course. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China, June 8-11, 2015.: 
Silja, K., Hurskainen, L. Irma, M. (2011). Curriculum Development for Clean Technology. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011. : 
UNEP (2009). United Nations Environment Programme (2009). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Available at: http://www.cdo.ugent.be/publicaties/280.guidelines-sLCA.pdf: 
United Nations (2016). Sustainable Development Goals. 17 goals to transform our world. Available at: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/: 
Wedel, M.K., Malmqvist, J., Arehag, M. & Svanström, M. (2008). Implementing engineering education for environmental sustainability into CDIO programs. Proceedings of the 4th International CDIO Conference, Hogeschool Gent, Gent, Belgium, June 16-19, 2008.: 
Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 13.3, pp. 199-226. : 
Go to top