DESIGN PROCESS REPORTING TOOL FOR MAPPING AND PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION

DESIGN PROCESS REPORTING TOOL FOR MAPPING AND PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION

G. Fischl, B. Erlandsson (2022).  DESIGN PROCESS REPORTING TOOL FOR MAPPING AND PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION. 848-858.

The integrative design process is becoming a fundamental part of courses offered at the Construction engineering and Lighting Sciences at Jönköping University, especially in the Architecture-engineering program. Various design processes are known, but the employed concept-test model is a good fit for the integrative design process. This study aimed to investigate how design learners' integrative design process works, and it was hypothesized that this approach fosters students' creativity. The integrative design process was separated into five tasks: Conceptualization with a mood board, Volume study, Floor-plans, Work in progress, and Poster. The quality of the design process was assessed in a Building renovation course using an online assessment platform called Design Process Reporting Tool (DIEGO). This tool measured hours spent on tasks, level of enjoyment, appraisal of the task's difficulty, perceived openness, control over the task performance, and perceived helpfulness of the peer. The results show that students suffer from performative tunnel vision and focus on the quantitative aspects rather than quality. Shortcomings in conceptual preparation and volume studies create frustration and place themselves in an uncomfortable zone. Two-thirds of the students could reach the creative zone with their peer in the process, and in the meantime control, opennes and enjoyment were experienced positively. The need to refine the conceptualization and volume study was made to unlock the full potential of the integrative design approach. Additionally, higher course grades were attainable for those individuals whose ratings on task enjoyment, effort, openness, control, and groupmate evaluation were less exaggerated.

Authors (New): 
Géza Fischl
B. Erlandsson
Pages: 
848-858
Affiliations: 
Jönköping University, Sweden
Keywords: 
Design Process
Openness
control
Creativity
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2022
Reference: 
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539-555.: 
10.1080/03043797.2014.895703
Fischl, G., Erlandsson, B. (2021). Design Exercise Strategy for Locus of Control and Self- Efficacy. 17th International CDIO Conference, Chulalongkorn University & Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Bangkok, Thailand, June 21-23, 2021: 
Fischl, G., Granath, K., Bremner, C. (2018). Mapping architectural engineering students' learning in group design exercises. Kanazawa: Kanazawa Institute of Technology, 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan, June 28 - July 2, 2018.: 
Fischl, G., Wänström Lindh, U. (2020). Change for group design exercises in a lighting design program. 16th International CDIO Conference, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 9-11 June 2020.: 
Kolarevic, B. (2009). Towards integrative design. International journal of architectural computing, 7(3), 335-344.: 
Malmqvist, J., Edström, K. & Rosén, A. (2020). CDIO Standards 3.0 - Updates to the Core CDIO Standards. Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted online by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 8–11, 2020.: 
Milburn, L. A. S., & Brown, R. D. (2003). The relationship between research and design in landscape architecture. Landscape and urban planning, 64(1-2), 47-66.: 
Nyka, L., Cudzik, J., & Urbanowicz, K. (2020). The CDIO model in architectural education and research by design. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18, 85- 90.: 
Rosén, A., Hermansson, H., Finnveden, G., & Edström, K. (2021). Experiences from Applying the CDIO Standard for Sustainable Development in Institution-Wide Program Evaluations. In 17th International CDIO Conference.: 
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.: 
Visser, W. (2010). Schön: Design as a reflective practice. Collection(2), 21-25. Retrieved from https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00604634: 
Go to top
randomness