COORDINATED DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF “BIOENGINEERING DESIGN” AND “MEDTECH” COURSES BY MEANS OF CDIO PROJECTS LINKED TO MEDICAL DEVICES

COORDINATED DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF “BIOENGINEERING DESIGN” AND “MEDTECH” COURSES BY MEANS OF CDIO PROJECTS LINKED TO MEDICAL DEVICES

A. Lantada, L. Sánchez, E. Tanarro, A. Romero, R. García, M. García, et al, et al (2018).  COORDINATED DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF “BIOENGINEERING DESIGN” AND “MEDTECH” COURSES BY MEANS OF CDIO PROJECTS LINKED TO MEDICAL DEVICES . 8.

Biomedical engineering is aimed at the application of engineering principles, methods and design concepts to medicine and biology for healthcare purposes and is directly connected with professional practice in the medical device industry. Industrial and management engineers, due to their broad education and global view, can significantly contribute to the advances in the biomedical field, especially if they learn some essential biomedical concepts and train specific professional skills during their university degrees. In this study we present the coordinated design and implementation of two courses devoted to the biomedical engineering field, namely “Bioengineering Design” and “MedTech”, included in the Master’s Degree in Industrial Engineering and in the Master’s Degree in Engineering Management respectively, both at the ETSI Industriales from Universidad Politecnica de Madrid. These courses follow the framework established by the Industriales Ingenia Initiative, which is completely aligned with the spirit of the International CDIO Initiative. Students from both courses collaborate in teams and live through the complete development life cycle of innovative medical devices (linked to relevant health concerns), from the product planning and specification stages, through the conceptual and basic engineering phases, including final validations with real prototypes, towards pre-production and commercialization considerations. These projects stand out for their degree of complexity and counting with such multidisciplinary teams, in which students from different backgrounds and with varied skills intimately collaborate, constitutes an interesting strategy for addressing the life cycle of innovative biodevices with a holistic approach. Socioeconomic issues, technical demands, environmental sustainability and overall viability are among the key aspects assessed by the students following systematic design methodologies. The team of professors has also lived somehow through a complete and quite challenging CDIO cycle, during the conception, curricular design, first implementation and assessment of these synchronized teaching-learning experiences, but the improvement of students’ learning outcomes and the inspiring ambience of collaboration created are worth the efforts. Main benefits, lessons learned and future challenges, linked to these courses and to the collaborative presented strategy, are analyzed, taking account of the available results from 2017-2018 academic year. 

Authors (New): 
Andrés Díaz Lantada
Luis Ignacio Ballesteros Sánchez
Enrique Chacón Tanarro
Ana Moreno Romero
Rafael Borge García
Miguel Ángel Peláez García
Rafael Ramos Díaz
Jesús Juan Ruíz
Pages: 
8
Affiliations: 
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Spain
Keywords: 
Biomedical Engineering
CDIO implementation
Case studies & best practices
integrated learning experiences
Active learning
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Bermejo, S. et al. (2016) Steps for iterating design-implement experiences into a CDIO Course. 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland. : 
Biomedical Engineering Society: Planning a career in biomedical engineering. BMES, USA. : 
CDIO Standards 2.0: http://www.cdio.org/implementing-cdio/standards/12-cdio-standards : 
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R. (2007) Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer, 1-286.: 
Díaz Lantada, A., et al. (2013) Towards successful project-based learning experiences in Engineering Education. Int. Journal of Eng. Education, 29(2), 476-490. : 
Díaz Lantada, A., et al. (2014) Evolution and implementation of CDIO activities at ETSII-UPM. 10th International CDIO Conference, Barcelona, Spain. : 
Díaz Lantada, A., et al. (2015) Integrating Biomedical Engineering Design into Engineering Curricula: Benefits and Challenges of the CDIO Approach, 11th International CDIO Conference, Cheng-Du, China.: 
Díaz Lantada, A., et al. (2016) CDIO experiences in Biomedical Engineering: Preparing Spanish students for the future of biomedical technology, 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland: 
Fagette, P.H. (Ed) (1999) The Biomedical Engineering Society: An Historical Perspective, BMES, USA. : 
Hernandez Bayo, A., et al. (2014) Integral framework to drive engineering education beyond technical skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6B), 1697-1707: 
Lumbreras Martín, J., et al. (2015) The INGENIA Initiative: A multidisciplinary set of subjets for promoting the CDIO methodology. 11th International CDIO Conference, Cheng-Du, China. : 
Lumbreras Martín, J., et al. (2016) The INGENIA Initiative for the Systematic Promotion of CDIO Methodology at TU Madrid: Lessons learned for enhanced performance. 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland. : 
Salerud, E.G. et al. (2006) Design-build experiences and student-centered learning in Biomedical Engineering curricula. 2nd International CDIO Conference, Linköping, Sweden. : 
Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Mc Gourty, J. (2005) The ABET professional skills, can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 41-55. : 
Go to top
randomness