CHARACTERISATION OF EFFECTIVE DELIVERY AND SUPERVISION OF CAPSTONE PROJECTS

CHARACTERISATION OF EFFECTIVE DELIVERY AND SUPERVISION OF CAPSTONE PROJECTS

T. Topping, M. Murphy (2022).  CHARACTERISATION OF EFFECTIVE DELIVERY AND SUPERVISION OF CAPSTONE PROJECTS. 324-337.

Delivering activities that are well aligned to the CDIO curriculum can present many challenges and often the complexity of these activities can lie outside the skill set of any single individual. Student projects at the University of Liverpool are now more complex than they were 15 years ago and it was felt that critical reflection of supervisory practice would be of benefit. This paper studies how the topic, structure, delivery and supervision of Capstone projects at University of Liverpool has evolved over the last 10 years. Several gradual shifts are noted: towards sustainability themes, towards cross-disciplinary approaches, and towards extended industrial collaboration. This paper presents an analysis of professional skills development in Capstone projects; drawing on consultation with academic faculty, current Capstone students and graduates now in employment. The prioritisation of various learning outcomes is compared across these three groups: the diversity of these outcomes suggests that academic faculty alone cannot hope to deliver them. This paper proposes that the key to effective delivery of complex learning activities lies not in developing and equipping any one individual supervisor with a never-ending skill set, but instead lies in fostering effective partnerships between a number of diverse individuals (academic faculty, technical staff, industrial partners). The paper then explores best practice in Capstone project supervision through reflection on current practice, and consultation with academic faculty supervisors, students, technicians and industrial partners/supervisors. The benefits of involving technicians and industrial partners in the development and delivery of Capstone projects is discussed; and the use of recent graduates as industrial supervisors is explored. The concept of using ‘Communities of Practice’ to guide and support Capstone supervision is presented and described. In light of our recent experience of using Communities of Practice, we also explore how this has the potential to augment faculty development initiatives, and to improve the competency of staff delivering Capstone supervision.

Authors (New): 
Tony Topping
Matt Murphy
Pages: 
324-337
Affiliations: 
University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
Capstones Project Supervision
Technicians
Industrial Collaboration
faculty development
community of practice
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2022
Reference: 
Beckman E.A. (2016), Forums, Fellowship and Wicked Problems in Teaching, In: McDonlald J., Carter-Steel A., Communities of Practice, pp 545-565 Springer, Singapore,: 
Bhadani K., Hulthén E., Malmqvist J., Edelbro C., Ryan A., Tanner D., et al, et al (2017). CDIO Course Development for Faculty in Raw Materials Programmes, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference: 
Bradley S. (2018), Recognising the contribution Technicians make to teaching and supporting students through HEA Fellowships, AdvanceHE, Available at: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/newsand- views/recognising-contribution-technicians-make-teaching-and-supporting-students-through (Accessed on 10th January 2022): 
Brumm T.J., Hanneman L.F. and Mickelson S.K., Assessing and Developing Program Outcomes through Workplace Competencies, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 22(1), 2006, pp 123-129.: 
Case J. (2008), Education Theories on Learning: An Informal Guide for the Engineering Education Scholar, An Engineering Subject Centre Guide, Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre: 
Cleveland-Innes M., Stenbom S., Gauvreau (2017) Technology and teaching in engineering education: A blended course for faculty, Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking engineering education - the CDIO approach (Second edition ed.): Springer: 
Crawley, Edward & Malmqvist, Johan & Lucas, William & Brodeur, Doris. (2011). The CDIO Syllabus v2. 0 An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education.: 
Eckert G., Hjelmåker M., Elmquist L. (2013), Off Campus Integrating Theory and Practice with Progression, Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference: 
Engineering Council (2014), The Accreditation of Higher Education Programmes: UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence (UK-SPEC), Engineering Council, Available at https://www.engc.org.uk/ahep (Accessed 10th January 2022): 
Gherardi S., Nicolini D. (2000), The Organizational Learning of Safety in Communities of Practice, Journal of Management Inquiry, 9 (1) pp. 7-18: 
Higher Education Statistics Agency (2018), Destination of Leavers from Higher Education, Survey, Available at: https://discoveruni.gov.uk/course-details/10006842/MENG_MEEN/Full-time/ (Accessed 23rd December 2020): 
Hurn, K.M. (2016), Joined up Thinking? A Review of the Impact of a Higher Education and Industry Partnership on Undergraduate Product Design Students. Industry and Higher Education. 2016;30(2):129-139.: 
Institution of Mechanical Engineers (2022), Formula Student; Available at https://www.imeche.org/events/formula-student ; (Accessed 10th January 2022): 
Johnson C. M. (2001), A survey of current research on online communities of practice, The Internet and Higher Education, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 45-60,: 
Lewis P.A., Gospel H. (2015), Technicians under the microscope: the training and skills of university laboratory and engineering workshop technicians, Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 67:4, 421-441,: 
10.1080/13636820.2015.1076502
Marchand A., Luong G., Vo T. (2018) A Case Study Designing Training Curricula to Support Implementation of CDIO, Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference: 
Northedge A. (2003) Rethinking Teaching in the Context of Diversity, Teaching in Higher Education, 8:1, 17-32,: 
10.1080/1356251032000052302
Papadopoulou P., Bhadani K., Hulthén E., Malmqvist J., Edström K. (2019). CDIO Faculty Development Course – Built-in Implementation, Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference: 
Paul, R., Hugo, R. J., & Falls, L. C. (2015). International Expectations of Engineering Graduate Attributes. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference: 
Thomson G., Gommer L., (2018), The Development of Technical Staff Competencies Via International Exchange, Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference: 
Tomkinson C., Engel C., Tomkinson R. (2009). Dealing with Wicked Global Problems: An Inter- Disciplinary Approach. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching.: 
10.22329/celt.v2i0.3199
Wick C. (2000), Knowledge Management and Leadership Opportunities for Technical Communications, Technical Communication, Vol. 47, No. 4 (NOVEMBER 2000), pp. 515-529: 
Wenger E. (2001) Supporting communities of practice: a survey of community-oriented technologies. (pp.3) Available at https://www.teluq.ca/inf6400c/module2/m2txt2_6.pdf (Accessed 13th February 2021): 
Wu H. (2017), The Essentiality of Sustainability and Variety for Industry Collaborations with University Partners, International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, Vol. 10, No. 2: 
Go to top
randomness