The CDIO Syllabus: A Comparative Study of Expected Student Proficiency

The CDIO Syllabus: A Comparative Study of Expected Student Proficiency

J. Bankel, K. Berggren, K. Blom, E. Crawley, I. Wiklund, S. stlund (2003).  The CDIO Syllabus: A Comparative Study of Expected Student Proficiency. 29.

This paper describes a unique international collaboration among four universities to reform engineering education. The collaborators agreed to a statement of goals, which include descriptions of knowledge, skills and attitudes vital to an effective education, and codifies proficiency levels expected of graduates. We developed and utilized unique stakeholder surveys to both validate our prototype and determine desired proficiency levels. The collaboration resulted in the CDIO Syllabus, A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education.

The Syllabus is both a template and a process that can be used to customize the syllabus to others’ programs. It can define new educational initiatives, and be employed as the basis for rigorous assessment. This paper details how, with the input of industry, academia and others, the collaborators employed an engineering problem solving paradigm to effect redesign. It outlines the Syllabus and the unique process employed to create it.

This paper was published in the European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 28 No. 3 (2003) and is posted here by permission.

Authors (New): 
Johan Bankel
Karl-Fredrik Berggren
Karin Blom
Edward F. Crawley
Ingela Wiklund
Sören Östlund
Pages: 
29
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords: 
CDIO Syllabus
Year: 
2003
Reference: 
HAUG, G. AND TAUCH, C. (2001) Trends in Learning Structures in Higher Education (II). Follow-up Report prepared for the Salamanca and Prague Conferences: 
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Engineering Criteria 2000, Baltimore, MD, 1994. Available at http://www.abet.org: 
BRODEUR, D.R., E.F. CRAWLEY, I. INGEMARSSON, J. MALMQVIST, and S. OSTLUND, “International Collaboration in the Reform of Engineering Education”, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 16-19, 2002. Available at http://www.asee.org/conferences/proceedings/search.cfm: 
ASEE Engineering Deans Council Corporate Roundtable, Engineering Education for a Changing World, Washington, DC, American Society for Engineering Education,1994.: 
SUTHERLAND, T.E., and C.C. BONWELL, eds., “Using Active Learning in College Classes: A Range of Options for Faculty”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 67, San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass, 1996.: 
HALL, S.R., I. WAITZ, D. R. BRODEUR, D. H. SODERHOLM, and R. NASR, “Adoption of Active Learning in a Lecture-Based Engineering Class", 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 06-09 November 2002.: 
BRODEUR, D.R., P.W. YOUNG, and K.B. BLAIR, Problem-Based Learning in Aerospace Engineering Education, Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, 16-19 June 2002. Available at http://www.asee.org/conferences/proceedings/search.cfm: 
HUBA, M.E., and J.E. FREED, Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses, Boston, Massachusetts, Allyn and Baron, 2000: 
PALOMBA, C.A., and T.W. BANTA, Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementation, and Improving Assessment for Higher Education, San Francisco, California, Jossey-Bass, 1999.: 
CRAWLEY, E.F., The CDIO Syllabus – A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2001.: 
The Boeing Company, Desired Attributes of an Engineer: Participation with Universities, 1996. Available at http://www.boeing.com: 
Go to top