CDIO approach to write Reference Models for training decision skills

CDIO approach to write Reference Models for training decision skills

Preparing engineering students for the future is becoming increasingly challenging as the pace in world and business environment escalates. The CDIO initiative provides curriculum designers and faculty with a template that stress the fundamental attributes that engineering graduates should possess when they enter the workplace. As discussed in this article, the template can also be applied as a framework to set forth educational guidelines on a particular subject. In particular this article examines how the CDIO methodological approach is applied to mature a procedure for enhancing certain managerial skills. The procedure is aimed to guide educational institutions how to implement training on judgement and decision-making skills in situations that are volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA). The outcome presents seven essential and successive decision skills that are to be adopted in the curriculum. The curriculum development is progressed via six stage-based reference models (6RM). Each of the six reference models constitutes the set of criteria needed for the implementation and adaption of the required change processes. Furthermore, each reference model comes with a rubric for a self-assessment on the current maturity of a VUCA based educational program. The point position to communicate the seven decision skills and other managerial challenges to address can also be scaled with the 6RM. The seven decision skills and the Six Reference Models are the offspring of the Erasmus+ funded program Dahoy that started in 2017 and completed in 2020. The 6RM were tested as a pilot study at the Engineering Department of Reykjavik University in 2020 with positive results.

Authors (New): 
Thordur Vikingur Fridgeirsson
Haraldur Audunsson
Ásrún Matthíasdóttir
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Reykjavik University, Iceland
Keywords: 
Decision Making
reference models
Curriculum
Dahoy
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Audunsson, H., Fridgeirsson, T. V. and Saemundsdottir, I. (2018). Challenging Engineering Students With Uncertainty in a VUCA Situation, Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan.: 
Dahoy (2018). Deliverable O1: Towards Reinforcing Decision Making Skills of Higher and Vocational Education & Training Students. Retrieved from https://www.imtatlantique. fr/sites/default/files/document/DAhoy-Output1-Year1.pdf: 
Dahoy (2020). Deliverable O3: A Decision Skills Framework for Higher and VET students, continuously integrative for educational programme addressing VUCA contexts. Retrieved from https://www.imt-atlantique.fr/sites/default/files/Dahoy/O3-Year3.pdf: 
Fridgeirsson, T. V., Ingason, H. T., Jonasson, H. I. & Kristjansdottir, B. H. (2021). The VUCAlity of Projects: A New Approach to Assess a Project Risk in a Complex World. Sustainability 2021, 13(7), 3808: 
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073808.
Gaultier Le Bris, S., Rouvrais, S., Vikingur Fridgeirsson, T., Tudela Villalonga, L., and Waldeck, R. (2017). In Proceedings of the 45th SEFI 2017 Conference "Education Excellence For Sustainable Development", Terceira Island, Azores, Portugal.18-21 September.: 
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.: 
Kusrini, N. A. R. (2018). Comparative Theory on Three Instructional Designs: Dick and Carrey, Kemp, and Three Phases. Retrieved January 2020 at https://osf.io/js8kr/: 
Latha, S & Prabu, C.B. (2020). Vuca in Engineering Education: Enhancement of Faculty Competency for Capacity Building. 9th World Engineering Education Forum, WEEF 2019, Procedia Computer Science, 172, 741–747.: 
Raiffa, H. & Schlaifer, R. (1961). Applied Statistical Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.: 
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal, 44:5.: 
10.1177/0033688212473293
Rouvrais, S., Audunsson, H., Esnault, L. and Fridgeirsson, T. V. (2020). Decision Skills in Engineering Programs - a Key for a VUCA Era, 2020 IFEES World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC), Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 1-5,: 
10.1109/WEEFGEDC49885.2020.9293669
Rouvrais, S., Gaultier Lebris, S. & Stewart, M. (2018). Engineering students ready for a VUCA world? A design based on research on decisionship. 14th International CDIO Conference, Jun 2018, Kanazawa, Japan. ⟨hal-02959211⟩.: 
Seow, P, Pan, G & Koh, G. (2018). Examining an experiential learning approach to prepare students for the volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA) work environment. The International Journal of Management Education. Volume 17, Issue 1, March 2019, Pages 62-76: 
Taleb, N. (2007). The Black Swan, Random House, New York.: 
Go to top
randomness