CDIO APPROACH ON O2O INTERNATIONAL LEARNING MODEL THROUGH SDG COURSE

Home » CDIO APPROACH ON O2O I ...

CDIO APPROACH ON O2O INTERNATIONAL LEARNING MODEL THROUGH SDG COURSE

A. Sinsuw, T. Chen, C. Chu, C. Hsueh, B. Jai (2021).  CDIO APPROACH ON O2O INTERNATIONAL LEARNING MODEL THROUGH SDG COURSE. 10.
2021 The 17th CDIO International Conference, RMUTT and Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
PDF icon 51.pdf.pdf

This study explores the experiences of an online and on-site (O2O) learning model of the seven international institution courses on Sustainable Development Goals from multidisciplinary fields. The paper explores what makes for effective teaching of sustainability within a multidisciplinary online and on-site context. This experience has impacted social, economic, and environmental sustainability from an engineering perspective. One of the learning outcomes of this course, as stated in CDIO Standard 3.0, is that students had interpersonal learning outcomes that focus on individual cognitive and affective development, such as personal and group interactions, teamwork, and communications in foreign languages. Opportunities are made available for students to study abroad and have international experiences such as internships and exchanges. This course is to practice the actual case studies from global communities in a collaborative manner. The 17 SDGs goals related to Smart Green Synergy were expecting to be understood by students. Member universities and research institutes give the online lecture presentation where students may have global insight into synergy, especially in the engineering implementation, leading to intelligent and green resources to overcome the climate change issue. The pandemic of the Covid-19 situation constrained the five universities in South East Asia to carry out online classes. In contrast, an on-site course was performing by Feng Chia University students with normal class activities. Students are encouraged to think critically to formulate problems, provide a solution internationally and define issues and solutions tailored to SDGs. Students' grade distribution showed a good result of achievement, which implied the expected learning outcomes had been achieved. Result analysis showed that from the 16.67% "Very Good" category in the mid-term, it increased to 42% in the final term. Other classes have decreased, but some are stable. Overall, there was an increase in the study results' improvement by approximately 150%.

Authors (New): 
Alicia Amelia Elizabeth Sinsuw
Tsung-Hsien Chen
Chen-Yeon Chu
Chen-Hua Hsueh
Ben-ray Jai
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Feng Chia University, Taiwan
Sam Ratulangi University, Indonesia
Keywords: 
SDGs
smart green synergy (SGS)
CDIO
online and on-site (O2O)
international course
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
Year: 
2021
Reference: 
Assembly, G. (2015). Sustainable development goals. SDGs Transform Our World, 2030.: 
Berggren, K.-F., Brodeur, D., Crawley, E. F., Ingemarsson, I., Litant, W. T., Malmqvist, J., & Östlund, S. (2003). CDIO: An international initiative for reforming engineering education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 2(1), 49-52.: 
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay, 20, 24.: 
Bowyer, J., & Chambers, L. (2017). Evaluating blended learning: Bringing the elements together. Research Matters: A Cambridge Assessment Publication, 23, 17-26.: 
Cheung, K., Lam, J., Lau, N., & Shim, C. (2010). Instructional design practices for blended learning. Paper presented at the 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering.: 
Jambari, H., Razali, N. A., Taman, I., Noh, N. H., Osman, S., Ahmad, J., . . . Rameli, M. R. M. (2018). Conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO) approach for an innovative capstone project. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 10(2).: 
Lee, B. X., Kjaerulf, F., Turner, S., Cohen, L., Donnelly, P. D., Muggah, R., . . . MacGregor, L. S. (2016). Transforming our world: implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. Journal of public health policy, 37(1), 13-31.: 
Li, H., & Mu, D. (2019). The Construction of Blended Learning Mode Based on" Rain Classroom". Paper presented at the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Humanities (AEMH 2019).: 
Loyer, S., Muñoz, M., Cárdenas, C., Martínez, C., Cepeda, M., & Faúndez, V. (2011). A CDIO approach to curriculum design of five engineering programs at UCSC. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen.: 
Malmqvist, J., Bennedsen, J., Edström, K., Kuptasthien, N., Sripakagorn, A., Roslöf, J., . . . Siiskonen, M. The 16 th International CDIO Conference. Proceedings–Full Papers, 1.: 
Malmqvist, J., Knutson Wedel, M., Lundqvist, U., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Fruergaard Astrup, T., . . . Lyng, R. (2019). Towards CDIO standards 3.0. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference.: 
Murphy, C. N. (2006). The United Nations Development Programme: A Better Way? : Cambridge University Press.: 
Rieckmann, M. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives: UNESCO Publishing.: 
Rovai, A. P., Wighting, M. J., Baker, J. D., & Grooms, L. D. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure perceived cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning in traditional and virtual classroom higher education settings. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(1), 7-13.: 
Shiel, C., Smith, N., & Cantarello, E. (2019). Aligning Campus Strategy with the SDGs: An Institutional Case Study. Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development: Supporting the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals, 11.: 
Sinsuw, A. A. E., Wuisang, C. E., & Chu, C.-Y. (2020). Assessment of environmental and social impacts on rural community by two-stage biogas production pilot plant from slaughterhouse wastewater. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 101796.: 
Summers, M., Corney, G., & Childs, A. (2003). Teaching sustainable development in primary schools: An empirical study of issues for teachers. Environmental education research, 9(3), 327-346.: 
Vladimirova, K., & Le Blanc, D. (2016). Exploring links between education and sustainable development goals through the lens of UN flagship reports. Sustainable Development, 24(4), 254-271.: 
Zamora-Polo, F., Sánchez-Martín, J., Corrales-Serrano, M., & Espejo-Antúnez, L. (2019). What do university students know about sustainable development goals? A realistic approach to the reception of this UN program amongst the youth population. Sustainability, 11(13), 3533.: 
Zarifis, A., Efthymiou, L., Demetriou, S., & Cheng, X. THE CDIO APPROACH AND COLLABORATIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT IN DISTANCE LEARNING.: 
on February 11, 2022 - 08:56   Maria Siiskonen
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top