Supporting Engineering Innovation and Design by a Multidisciplinary Master's Program

Supporting Engineering Innovation and Design by a Multidisciplinary Master's Program

A. Karltun, M. Berglund (2013).  Supporting Engineering Innovation and Design by a Multidisciplinary Master's Program. 10.

The aim of this paper is to reflect on lessons learned from a master's program with a multidisci-plinary approach. The rapidly developing technology and specialization in society, business, industry and labor puts a demand on education to provide specialist skills in various technical fields. Paradoxically, the increasing complexity also demands skills from different disciplines, such as understanding human capabilities to handle technically complex systems and adapting technology to the design of organizational and individual working conditions in different work-places and businesses. Therefore, knowledge and experience from engineers often need to be combined with skills and experience from the domain of behavioral and health scientists in order to obtain good usability and system performance. It is not, however, an easy task to combine experiences from different domains of expertise, as diverse traditions are deeply institutionalized by different approaches and research platforms and not easily adapted and integrated within engineering faculty. The master’s program reported on in this paper is an example of promoting a multidisciplinary approach contributing to an effective CDIO implementation. The design of the master’s program includes a combination of courses from a number of scientific disciplines with teachers who represent different theoretical areas, practical skills and in addition a careful mix of examination forms. Furthermore, the students' different backgrounds and learning traditions as engineers, behavioral and health scientists create a platform with excellent opportunities to learn from each other in order to develop new and innovative ways of thinking and approaching de-sign and business development. It also offers opportunities to experience and reflect on the cul-tural contradictions between educational disciplines and  practice.

 

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

 

Authors (New): 
Anette Karltun
Martina Berglund
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords: 
Humans
technology and organization
Ergonomics
systems thinking
pedagogics
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S. and, Brodeur, D., Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach, Springer Verlag, New York, 2007.: 
Pee, S.H. and Leong, H., “Implementing Project Based Learning Using CDIO concepts”, 1 st Annual CDIO Conference, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2005.: 
Robinson, K., Friedrich, H., Kirkpatrick, R., Nicholas, C. and Rowe, G., “A Template for Change? De-risking theTransition to CDIO”, Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, 2012: 
Van Kasteren, J.M.N., “Interdisciplinary Teaching Within Engineering Education”, European Journal of Engineering Education, v. 21, 1996, 387-392.: 
Borrego, M., and Newswander, L. K., “Characteristics of Successful Cross-Disciplinary Engineering Education Collaborations”, Journal of Engineering Education, v. 97, 2008, 123-134.: 
Docherty, P., Forslin, J., and Shani, A. B. (Rami), Creating Sustainable Work Systems: Emerging perspectives and practice, Routledge, London and New York, 2002.: 
Karwowski, W., Salvendy, G., Badham, R. Brodner, P., Clegg, C., Hwang, S.L., Iwasawa, J., Kidd, P.T., Kobayashi, N., Koubek, R., LaMarsh, J., Nagamachi, M., Naniwada, M., Salzman, H., Seppala, P., Schallock, B., Sheridan, T., and Warschat, J., “Integrating People, Organization, and Technology in Advanced Manufacturing: A Position Paper Based on the Joint View of Industrial Managers”, Engineers, Consultants, and Researchers. The International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, v. 4, 1994, 1-19.: 
Corlett, E.N. and Clark, C., The Ergonomics of Workspaces and Machines: A Design Manual, 2nd edition, Taylor and Francis, London, 1995.: 
IEA (International Ergonomics Association), 2000, www.iea.cc, retrieved 20-01-2013.: 
Ahlin, J. (Ed.), The Research Perspectives – Researchers’ view on the interaction between Humans, Technology, Organization, Stockholm: Närings- och teknikutvecklingsverket (NUTEK), 1999. (In Swedish): 
National Agency for Higher Education, Evaluation of Undergraduate and Postgraduate Education in Work Science at Swedish universities - Quality Audit, 2006, Report 2006:5 R. (In Swedish): 
Heinze, A., and Procter, C., “Reflections on the Use of Blended Learning”, Paper presented at the Conference on Education in a Changing Environment, 2004, University of Salford, UK.: 
Go to top
randomness