Does Flexibility in Secondary Level Mathematics Curriculum Affect Degree Performance?

Does Flexibility in Secondary Level Mathematics Curriculum Affect Degree Performance?

J. Cole, C. McCartan (2013).  Does Flexibility in Secondary Level Mathematics Curriculum Affect Degree Performance?. 10.

The authors have much experience in developing mathematics skills of first-year engineering students and attempting to ensure a smooth transition from secondary school to university. Concerns exist due to there being flexibility in the choice of modules needed to obtain a secondary level (A-level) mathematics qualification. This qualification is based on some core (pure maths) modules and a selection from mechanics and statistics modules. A survey of aerospace and mechanical engineering students in Queen’s University Belfast revealed that a combination of both mechanics and statistics (the basic module in both) was by far the most popular choice and therefore only about one quarter of this cohort had studied mechanics beyond the basic module within school maths. Those students who studied the extra mechanics and who achieved top grades at school subsequently did better in two core, firstyear engineering courses. However, students with a lower grade from school did not seem to gain any significant advantage in the first-year engineering courses despite having the extra mechanics background. This investigation ties in with ongoing and wider concerns with secondary level mathematics provision in the UK.



Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

 

 

Authors (New): 
Jonathan Cole
Charles McCartan
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
mathematics
mechanics
Curriculum
first-year
Engineering
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Hawkes T., and Savage M., Measuring the Mathematics Problem, Engineering Council, London, 2000. : 
GCE in Mathematics Specification, Council for the Curriculum, Examinations and Assessment, Belfast, 2010. Available from: http://www.ccea.org.uk/ [Accessed 20 March 2013]. : 
Porkess R., “The new AS and A levels in mathematics,” MSOR Connections, v. 3, no. 4, 2003, 12- 16.: 
Robinson C. L., Harrison M. C., and Lee S., Mechanics Report: Responding to the Changes in the Teaching and Learning of Mechanics in Schools, Higher Education Academy – Engineering Subject Centre, Loughborough, 2005.: 
Lee S., Harrison M. C., and Robinson C. L., “Engineering students’ knowledge of mechanics upon arrival: expectation and reality,” Engineering Education: Journal of the Higher Education Academy Engineering Subject Centre, v. 1, no. 1, 2006, 32-38. : 
Savage M., and Stripp C., Newton’s Mechanics: Who needs it?, Higher Education Academy – The Maths, Stats & OR Network, Birmingham, 2009. : 
Clements D., “Prior knowledge of mechanics amongst first year engineering students,” Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, v. 26, no. 3, 2007, 119-123. : 
McCarthy T. J., Carew A. L., Gardner A., Goldfinch T., Henderson A., and Thomas G., A Pro-active Approach to Addressing Student Learning Diversity in Engineering Mechanics, Australian Learning and Teaching Council, Strawberry Hills, 2011. : 
Dwight R. A., and Carew A. L., “Investigating the causes of poor student performance in basic mechanics,” Proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the Australasian Association of Engineering Education, Auckland, 2006. : 
Steif P. S., Dollar A., and Dantzler J. A., “Results from a statics concept inventory and their relationship to other measures of performance in statics,” Proceedings of the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education conference, Indianapolis, 2005. : 
Hestenes D., and Wells M., “A mechanics baseline test,” The Physics Teacher, v. 30, 1992, 159- 166. : 
Go to top