D. Wei
(2009). ACTIVE LEARNING IN NAVAL ARCHITECTURE.
12. Knowledge of naval architecture is a fundamental requirement for those working in the marine industry. The ability to design and construct marine vehicles requires the understanding of many theoretical principles. In a naval architecture course, the breadth and depth of content to be covered is very broad. There is always a danger that educators will resort to delivering every lesson in transmission mode, adopting a “tell-all” approach that focuses only on the development of theoretical knowledge. This paper describes the changes made to the learning design of a module, Naval Architecture I, offered by the School of Engineering in Ngee Ann Polytechnic to enhance learning. This module is a foundational module taken by learners without background knowledge in this area of discipline. The key change involved a shift from the traditional “tell-all” approach to one that is more constructivist and experiential. Lessons were re-designed to include activities that encouraged active engagements from learners in learning. Opportunities to develop learners in their personal and professional skills such as e-competency, teamwork and communication were also woven into the lesson. The paper will describe (1) a change in laboratory experience to support theory-to-practice progression by getting learners to physically construct a model of the hull-form, verify their computations and discuss any variations observed. (2) the use of a ship simulation tool to stimulate learners‟ interest and more importantly help them visualise various parts of a marine vehicle, an important experience that brings in the context for what they are going to study in the rest of the module. (3) an activity to encourage self-directed learning and reflection through concept maps. The paper will also discuss learners‟ feedback and response to the changes.
Affiliations:
Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords:
E-competency
simulation tools
Concept Maps
Active learning
Reference:
Bloom B.S., Englehart M. D., Furst E. J., Hill W. H., & Krathwohl D. R., The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I : Cognitive Domain, David McKay , 1956.:
Chanda S., “Facilitating Effective Learning using Learning Triangle Approach”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Education, 2005.:
Chanda S., “Revisiting Teaching and Learning through Learning Triangle”, Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on Education, 2007.:
Chatterjea K., “New Technologies & Teaching Methodologies to meet the future needs of the 21st Century Seafarers”, International Conference on “The Ship‟s Command – Preparing & Supporting the Master and His Team for the Challenges of the Future”, 2005.:
Dewey J., How We Think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process, Boston: D.C. Heath, 1933:
Gardner H., Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983.:
Gee J.P., Shaffer D.W., Squire K.R. & Halverson R., Video Games and the Future of Learning, WCER Working Paper No. 2005-4, 2005.:
Kolb D., Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.:
McManus H.L., Rebentisch E., Murman E.M. & Stanke A., “Teaching Lean Thinking Principles through Hands-on Siumulations”, Proceedings of the Third International CDIO Conference, 2005.:
Mitchell A. & Savill-Smith C., The use of computer and video games for learning (A review of the literature), Learning and Skills Development Agency, UK, 2004.:
Novak J. D., Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept Maps(R) as facilitative tools in schools and corporations, Mahweh, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.:
Novak J. D. & Cañas A. J., “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them”, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, 2008.:
Smith R.M., Learning How To Learn, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge, 1982.:
Stringer E., Action Research in Education 2nd Edition, Pearson Education, 2008.:
Tan O.S., Parsons R.D., Hinson S.L. & Sardo-Brown D., Educational Psychology. A Practitioner-Researcher Approach (An Asian Edition), Thomson, 2003.:
Tan O.S., Problem-based Learning Innovation: Using Problems To Power Learning In The 21st Century, CENGAGE Learning Int'l Row, 2003.:
Weck O.L., Kim I.Y. & Hassan R., “Active Learning Games”, Proceedings of the First International CDIO Conference, 2005.:
http://www.shipsim.com/home.php:
http://www.delftship.net/:
The New Paper, Article on the fun image of Ngee Ann Polytechnic, 26 Mar 2009: