|
|
||||||||||||||||||
| HOME |
T Adoption of Active Learning in a Lecture-Based Engineering Class Hall, Waitz, Brodeur, Soderholm, Nasr A Assessing engineering students' modeling skills Lingefjärd A Assessing teaching & learning of mathmatics in the mechanical engineering program at Chalmers T.U. Lingefjärd A Assessment and mathematics examinations in the CDIO project Lingefjärd W The CDIO Initiative from an Automatic Control Project Course Perspective Enqvist Gunnarsson, Norrlöf, Wernholt, Hansson G CDIO: An International Initiative for Reforming Engineering Education Berggren, Brodeur, Crawley, Ingemarsson, Litant, Malmqvist, Östlund C The CDIO Syllabus: A comparative study of expected student proficiency Bankel, Berggren, Blom, Crawley, Östlund, Wiklund W Experiences
from the Transformation of an Engineering Education Introductory Project
Design Course Into a Project Design-Build-Test Course Gustafsson W The IDE Studio
Norrström W
Lessons Learned from
Design-Build Test-Based Project Courses Malmqvist, Young,
Hallström, Kuttenkeuler, Svensson T Problem-Based Learning in Professional Education Brodeur T Recommendations to Address Barriers in CDIO Project-based Courses Andersson, Edström, Eles, Knutson - Wedel, Engström, Soderholm G Student involvment in principled change: Understanding the student experience Edström, Engström, Wiklund, Törnevik T Survey
of Laboratory Exercises within the Applied Physics and Electrical
Engineering (Y) program at Linköping University. Gunnarsson,
Eles, Krantz-Rülcker, Frykman C A
Transatlantic Program for Teaching Engineering Ethics
Collste A Using portfolios for exit assessment in engineering programs Brodeur A Writing mathematics and assessment in the CDIO project Lingefjärd Adoption of Active Learning in a Lecture-Based Engineering Class.
By Steven R. Hall, Ian Waitz, Doris R. Brodeur, Diane H. Soderholm,
and Reem Nasr In 1999, the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
at MIT expanded its repertoire of active learning strategies and assessment
tools with the introduction of muddiest-point-in-the-lecture cards,
electronic response systems, concept tests, peer coaching, course Web
pages, and Web-based course evaluations. This paper focuses on the change
process of integrating these active learning strategies into a traditional
lecture-based multidisciplinary course, called Unified Engineering.
The description of the evolution of active learning in Unified Engineering
is intended to underscore the motivation and incentives required for
bringing about the change, and the support needed for sustaining and
disseminating active learning approaches among the instructors. Presented at the
ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 06-09
November 2002. Available here through the courtesy of
the American Society of Engineering Education. Assessing
engineering students' modeling skills. By
Thomas Lingefjärd
A group of researchers in mathematics education from Australia, England,
and Ireland who are concerned about how to detect and recognize students
modeling achievement, have devised assessment strategies and a mathematical
modeling test for measuring general and specific competencies in modeling
and applications. The mathematical-modeling test used in this study
is intended to collect evidence of growth in mathematical modeling competencies. Assessing
the teaching & learning of mathematics in the mechanical engineering
program at Chalmers Technical University. By Thomas Lingefjärd
The way students
actually learn mathematics, in or outside an engineering program, is
hard to follow and analyze. This study for one and a half years so far
illustrates that engineering students' conceptual growth in algebra
depends more on the engineering subjects than on the algebra course,
and that some of the concepts and routine skills in the algebra course
seem to stay out of reach even after one year. Presented by Prof. Thomas Lingefjärd of Chalmers Technical
University and Göteborg University at the North American Chapter
of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education
conference in Athens, Georgia, USA, 26-29 October 2002. Assessment
and mathematics examinations in the CDIO project. By Thomas
Lingefjärd The fact that
knowledge or understanding of mathematics is much more than just an
ability to calculate or solve routine problems is well spread common
knowledge among most of us who teach mathematics today. Yet, it can
be very hard to really define what we mean by understanding mathematics.
The fact that different taxonomies have been used for several years
to illustrate how different levels of understanding or achievement can
be matched against items of different conceptual difficulty is illustrated
in this paper. Bloom's taxonomy and the MATH taxonomy are discussed
in detail. This paper is a draft of a document to be used in
faculty workshops at Chalmers Technical University and Göteborg University
in Sweden. The CDIO Initiative from an Automatic Control Project Course Perspective. By M. Enqvist, S. Gunnarsson, M. Norrlöf, E. Wernholt and A. Hansson The CDIO Initiative is explained, and some of the results at the Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering program at Linköping University, Sweden, are presented. A project course in Automatic Control is used as an example. The projects within the course are carried out using the LIPS (Linköping interactive project steering) model. An example of a project, the golf playing industrial robot, and the results from this project are also covered. CDIO: An International Initiative for Reforming Engineering
Education. By Karl-Frederick Berggren, Doris Brodeur, Edward
Crawley, Ingemar Ingemarsson, William Litant, Johan Malmqvist, Sören
Östlund. With support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg
Foundation, the Royal Institute of Technology, Linköping University,
and Chalmers University of Technology, of Sweden; and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology of the US, launched the CDIO Initiative to improve
undergraduate engineering education in their countries, and, eventually,
worldwide. This paper describes the Initiative’s launch, progress
and impact. This
paper was published in World Transactions on Engineering and Technology
Education , Vol. 2 No.1 (2003). Available
here courtesy of the UNESCO
International Centre for Engineering Education and the UNESCO publication
World
Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education. The CDIO Syllabus: A comparative study of expected student proficiency. By Johan Bankel, Karl-Fredrik Berggren, Karin Blom, Edward F. Crawley, Sören Östlund, Ingela Wiklund This paper describes a unique international collaboration among four universities to reform engineering education. The collaborators agreed to a statement of goals, which include descriptions of knowledge, skills and attitudes vital to an effective education, and codifies proficiency levels expected of graduates. We developed and utilized unique stakeholder surveys to both validate our prototype and determine desired proficiency levels. The collaboration resulted in The CDIO Syllabus, A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education. The Syllabus is both a template and a process that can be used to customize the syllabus to others’ programs. It can define new educational initiatives, and be employed as the basis for rigorous assessment. This paper details how, with the input of industry, academia and others, the collaborators employed an engineering problem solving paradigm to effect redesign. It outlines the Syllabus and the unique process employed to create it. This paper was published in the European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.28 No. 3 (2003) and is posted here by permission. CDIO
Workshops and Laboratories Survey for the Vehicle Engineering Program
at the Royal Institute of Technology, KTH.
By HP Wallin and Sören Östlund A survey of the activities and physical
spaces with respect to workshops and laboratories in the Vehicle Engineering
Program at KTH was undertaken as part of the CDIO program. The results
of the survey include the total number of students at each department
that are involved in the eight different workshop and laboratory activities
described in this investigation, i.e., activities outside traditional
classroom teaching including lectures and tutorials. The results of
the survey show that there is a strong relation between the type of
subject and the use of workshops and laboratories. In mathematics and
numerical analysis, and computing science, there are only a few students
involved in activities which take place in particular workshop or laboratory
spaces; even then, these students are in a Student Work Place
Mode. On the other hand, in more applied subjects like machine
design, vehicle engineering, and aeronautics, a large number of students
are involved in more or less all of the eight different workshop and
laboratory activities considered in this investigation. Traditional
engineering science subjects like mechanics and solid mechanics typically
end up somewhere between these two extremes. The survey also presents
the equipment available at the different workshop and laboratory spaces
available to the Vehicle Engineering students, as well as the type of
general and CDIO-related activities taking place in the different spaces. (2002) Creating the CDIO Syllabus: A Universal Template for Engineering
Education. By E. F. Crawley This paper details how a team at MIT
identified and codified a set of goals for engineering education, which
can serve as the basis for curricular improvement and outcome based
assessment. The result of two years of scholarship, these goals are
embodied in The CDIO Syllabus, A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate
Engineering Education. The specific CDIO (Conceive Design
Implement Operate) Syllabus objective is to create rational,
complete, universal and generalizable goals for undergraduate engineering
education. The Syllabus focuses on personal, interpersonal and system
building skills, and leaves a placeholder for the disciplinary fundamentals
appropriate for any specific field of engineering. It complements and
significantly expands on ABETs criteria. The process of adapting
the Syllabus to a degree program includes a survey step to determine
the desired level of proficiency in the designated skills that is, by
consensus, expected of programs graduates. With rationale, detail
and broad applicability, the CDIO Syllabus principal value is
that it can be generalized to serve as a model from which any universitys
engineering programs may derive specific learning outcomes. Written
for presentation to the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,
Boston, MA, USA, 06-09 November 2002. Available
here through the courtesy of the American
Society of Engineering Education. Development of a Physical Prototyping
Lab at Chalmers University of Technology. By J. Malmqvist,
M. Distner Chalmers is developing a product realization lab
consisting of two basic facilities: the IDE studio which supports teams
working with virtual prototypes, and a physical prototyping lab that
enables students to implement and operate their own designs. This lab
will be a fundamental resource used throughout the ME education and
the IDE education. The development and planning of the prototyping lab
is described in this report. (27 September,
2001) Experiences
from the Transformation of an Engineering Education Introductory Project
Design Course Into a Project Design-Build-Test Course. By G. Gustafsson This paper describes the changes made to an
introductory course in Mechanical Engineering at Chalmers University
of Technology to transform it from a project design course into a project
design-build-test course. The aim is to inspire engineering educators
to introduce practical hands-on build (manufacture) elements in their
curricula through an account of the positive experiences gained. Presented
at NordDesign 2004, 18-20 August 2004, Tampere, Finland. First-year introductory courses as a means to develop conceive
design implement operate skills in engineering
education programmes. By G. Gustafsson, D. Newman, S. Stafström
and H. P. Wallin This paper presents a part of the ongoing Conceive
Design Implement Operate (CDIO) Program for Engineering
Education Reform, which is run by Chalmers University of Technology,
the Royal Institute of Technology and Linköping University, all
in Sweden, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA, USA. In the
paper we present and discuss first-year introductory courses in engineering
education programmes at the four universities from a CDIO perspective,
with an emphasis on the student projects in these courses. Presented the SEFI Annual Conference, Firenze, Italy, 08-11
September 2002 The IDE Studio - Development of an Environment
for Distributed Design Work. J. Norrström
Chalmers University of Technology has an objective to be on the front
line in the area of distributed engineering. Thus, a room especially
equipped for this type of work will be set up, the IDE studio. This
thesis is the initiating step towards establishing the type of functionalities
to be supported, and proposes how they could be carried out. This
paper is a Master of Science thesis presented 01 November 2001. Implementing Product Data Management in Product Development
Projects. P. Månsson, D. Nyberg The purpose of this thesis
work is to change and develop the Product Development course, given
to master level students at Chalmers, in line with the requirements
CDIO and the examiner have set up for the education. As part of this
a product data management system was implemented in the PD course to
better prepare students to perform design activities in a software environment
often used in industry. This paper is a Master of Science thesis
presented 19 December 2002. International Collaboration in the Reform of Engineering
Education. By D. Brodeur, E. Crawley, I. Ingemarsson, J. Malmqvist,
S. Östlund In October 2000, with support from the Wallenberg
Foundation, four universities launched an international collaboration
designed to improve undergraduate engineering education in Sweden, the
United States, and worldwide. This is a closely coordinated program
with parallel efforts at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm,
Linköping University in Linkoping, Chalmers University of Technology
in Göteborg, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The
vision of the project is to provide students with an education that
stresses engineering fundamentals set in the context of Conceiving-Designing-Implementing-Operating
real-world systems and products. The collaboration calls for three face-to-face
meetings per year, alternating venues among the four institutions. Videoconferencing,
email, and a dedicated Web page facilitate collaboration between meetings.
This paper describes the results of the first year of the collaboration,
the impact of the reform efforts, and the plans for the next three years. Lessons Learned from Design-Build
Test-Based Project Courses. By J. Malmqvist, P. Young, S. Hallström,
J. Kuttenkeuler, T. Svensson Projects in which students design,
build and test a device are increasingly being used in education. In
this paper, a number of design-build-test-based project courses are
analyzed. Findings indicates that these experiences do not only train
design skills but also effectively motivate students, integrate disciplinary
subjects, and provide a platform for teaching non-technical skills such
as communication. These learning events further receive very positive
evaluations from students, faculty and industry. However, design-build-test
tasks also require careful planning, different faculty competence and
re-designed learning environments. The paper suggests a set of guidelines
that help address these challenges in a course development process.
Presented at Design-2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 2004. Problem-Based Learning in Aerospace Engineering
Education. By D. Brodeur, P. Young, K. Blair Problem-based learning
is now a widespread teaching method in disciplines where students must
learn to apply knowledge, not just acquire it. In the undergraduate
curriculum in Aeronautics and Astronautics at MIT, problem-based learning
and design-build experiences are integrated throughout the program.
In an early freshman-year experience, Introduction to Aerospace and
Design, students design, build, and fly radio-controlled lighter-than-air
(LTA) vehicles. In the sophomore-year Unified Engineering course, students
design, build, and fly radio-controlled electric propulsion aircraft.
In a course on Aerodynamics, a case study from either industry or government
is used to provide an authentic problem. Upper-level capstone courses
are entirely problem-based. In these PBL experiences, students identify
problems of interest to them and experiment to find solutions, as well
as design complex systems that integrate engineering fundamentals in
a multidisciplinary approach. This paper describes several problem-based
learning experiences in undergraduate aerospace engineering at MIT within
a four-level framework for categorizing problems. It presents the learning
theories that underlie the success of PBL, identifies the basic characteristics
of PBL, critical features in the design of problems, and effective methods
for assessing PBL. Presented at the ASEE Conference, Montreal,
Canada, 16-19 June 2002.Available
here through the courtesy of the American
Society of Engineering Education. Problem-Based
Learning in Professional Education By D. Brodeur Recommendations
to Address Barriers in CDIO Project-based Courses. By Sven Andersson,
Kristina Edström, Petru Eles, Madelaine Engström, Maria Knutson-Wedel,
Diane H. Soderholm This report is presents the findings from
an examination of several project-based courses at three universities
in Sweden and one in the United States. Specifically the report contains
recommendations for possible solutions to common barriers to teaching
and learning in courses in which students work in pairs or groups to
complete projects. In addition to recommendations, actual tools and
resources are included to assist faculty who are planning or running
project-based courses. (Dec. 2003) Student
involvment in principled change: Understanding the student experience.
By K. Edström, M. Engström, Å. Wiklund, J. Törnevik
The CDIO Initiative is an international collaboration to reform
engineering programs of participating institutions. Student representatives
are actively involved in the process together with faculty and staff.
In order to better represent a majority of students, the student representatives
initiated and carried out a survey of learning experiences among their
peers. In the three participating Swedish engineering programs, students
were interviewed about their study experiences. Presented at the
2003 Improving Student Learning Conference, England. Survey
of Laboratory Exercises within the Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering
(Y) program at Linköping University. By S. Gunnarsson, P. Eles,
T. Krantz-Rülcker, P. Frykman A survey concerning the
laboratory exercise activities within the Applied Physics and Electrical
Engineering (Y) program at Linköping University is presented. The
aim of the survey has been to view the laboratory exercises from a CDIO perspective. Sixty-four laboratory exercises
have been covered by the survey. The main conclusions are that "verification
and/or illustration of principles" and "verification and testing"
are the activities most often found in the laboratory exercises, while
activities like "design" and "formulation of goals and
specifications" are less common. Towards
a New Model for First-Year Introductory Courses in Engineering Education
Programmes. By G. Gustafsson, J. Malmqvist, D. Newman, S. Stafström
and H. P. Wallin An important and common component of engineering
programmes is a first-year course aimed at introducing various subjects
as well as motivating the students and introducing them to the engineering
profession. This paper compares four such courses at Chalmers University
of Technology, The Royal Institute of Technology, Linköping University
and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Discriminators showing
details of each course are displayed and possible course development
is discussed. Presented at NordDesign, Trondheim, Norway,
August 2002
The
Use of Virtual Reality in the Development Process of a Physical Prototyping Laboratory. By F. Spelz
The use of virtual reality is shown in this report in the development
of a physical prototyping laboratory at Chalmers University of Technology. The presentation of this model will take place in a Virtual Reality
CAVE. (18 June 2001) Using
Concept Maps and Concept Questions to Enhance Conceptual Understanding.
By D. Darmofal, D. Soderholm and D. Brodeur Conceptual understanding
is the ability to apply knowledge across a variety of instances or circumstances.
Several strategies can be used to teach and assess concepts, e.g., inquiry,
exposition, analogies, mnemonics, imagery, concept maps, and concept
questions. This paper focuses on the last two -- concept maps and concept
questions. Concept maps are two-dimensional, hierarchical diagrams that
show the structure of knowledge within a discipline. Concept questions
are questions posed to students to encourage higher order thinking and
help them understand the basic principles of a discipline. This paper
describes progress at MIT in the development and use of concept maps
and concept questions in aerospace engineering. Presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,
Boston, MA, USA, 06-09 November 2002. Available
here through the courtesy of the American
Society of Engineering Education. Using portfolios for exit assessment in engineering programs. By D. Brodeur The MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics is designing a portfolio assessment system to assess students' achievement of program outcomes. The undergraduate aerospace engineering program has embarked upon major curriculum reform initiatives centered on 16 program outcomes detailed in its CDIO Syllabus. Portfolios will be organized into categories reflecting these outcomes. (The 16 CDIO skills, or program outcomes, are also the cornerstone of the program's self-study report for ABET accreditation.) This paper addresses the planning and development of portfolios for assessing students' achievement at the end of their MIT aerospace engineering program. Presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 06-09 November 2002. Available here through the courtesy of the American Society of Engineering Education. Writing mathematics and assessment in the CDIO project.By
T. Lingefjärd One growing concern about the change
of how one assesses mathematics is often connected to the use of technology.
Technology is used to reproduce pencil and paper work or in the development
of concepts, and, consequently, one has to change the way assessment
is practiced. One such change is to give students assignments where
they are expected to communicate the mathematics through writing. This
paper is a short example of how this can be connected to different taxonomies
of levels of learning and understanding. This paper is a draft
of a document to be used in faculty workshops at Chalmers Technical
University and Göteborg University in Sweden.
|
||||||||||||||||||