Feedback

IRM Title: Check the IRM reviewed:

Communications (3.2)

Teamwork (3.1)

Ethics (2.5.1)

Critical Thinking(2.4.4)

Reviewer (optional):

A. Structure

Each IRM is organized into similar sections. Indicate how helpful you find each of the sections in this IRM.

Comments about the organizational structure of the IRM:

B. Content

Each IRM addresses a specific CDIO topic. Rate the content and resources of the IRM in terms of their usefulness for those who will teach the topic.

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	Don’t Know
Clarity of information
Amount and level of detail
Quantity of ideas and materials
Quality of ideas and materials
Applicability of the teaching ideas
Little need for more preparation time

Comments about the content and resources of the IRM:

C. Web Access

IRMs will be accessible on the CDIO web site http://www.cdio.org.
Rate the ease of finding the information you are looking for in the IRM.

	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent	Don’t Know
Gaining access on the CDIO web site
Navigating through the IRM
Connecting to the links
Number of appropriate links
Easy-to-find information
Amount of repetition

Comments on the web site:

D. Overall

1. When planning a class activity or an entire course, would you likely consult this IRM?:

Yes-If yes, what percentage of the IRM materials are you likely to use?

No-If no, what could be changed to make the IRM more useful to you?

2. Are you likely to suggest this IRM to faculty colleagues?:

Yes

If yes, are there specific parts you would point them to?:

If no, what other resources might you suggest to faculty colleagues?:

3. What specific suggestions can you make to improve this IRM overall? And/or to the Teaching Ideas and Teaching Activities?: