|
|
||||||||||||||||||
CDIO: An International Initiative for Reforming Engineering EducationBerggren, Brodeur, Crawley, Ingemarsson, Litant, Malmqvist, Östlund International Collaboration in the Reform of Engineering
Education Brodeur, Crawley, Ingemarsson, Malmqvist, Östlund CDIO: An International Initiative for Reforming Engineering
Education. By Karl-Frederick Berggren, Doris Brodeur, Edward
Crawley, Ingemar Ingemarsson, William Litant, Johan Malmqvist, Sören
Östlund. With support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg
Foundation, the Royal Institute of Technology, Linköping University,
and Chalmers University of Technology, of Sweden; and the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology of the US, launched the CDIO Initiative to improve
undergraduate engineering education in their countries, and, eventually,
worldwide. This paper describes the Initiative’s launch, progress
and impact. This
paper was published in World Transactions on Engineering and Technology
Education , Vol. 2 No.1 (2003). Available
here courtesy of the UNESCO
International Centre for Engineering Education and the UNESCO publication
World
Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education. International Collaboration in the Reform of Engineering
Education. By D. Brodeur, E. Crawley, I. Ingemarsson, J. Malmqvist,
S. Östlund In October 2000, with support from the Wallenberg
Foundation, four universities launched an international collaboration
designed to improve undergraduate engineering education in Sweden, the
United States, and worldwide. This is a closely coordinated program
with parallel efforts at the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm,
Linköping University in Linkoping, Chalmers University of Technology
in Göteborg, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The
vision of the project is to provide students with an education that
stresses engineering fundamentals set in the context of Conceiving-Designing-Implementing-Operating
real-world systems and products. The collaboration calls for three face-to-face
meetings per year, alternating venues among the four institutions. Videoconferencing,
email, and a dedicated Web page facilitate collaboration between meetings.
This paper describes the results of the first year of the collaboration,
the impact of the reform efforts, and the plans for the next three years. International Engineering Education Reforms: The Implications of the Conceive - Design - Implement - Operate Program on South African Undergraduate Engineering Education. By Z. Mbanguta The South African Minister of Education’s release of the National Plan for Higher Education (2001) that has led to A New Academic Policy for Programmes and Qualifications in Higher Education, has indicated the way forward for the development of the National Qualifications Framework-based programs and qualifications for higher engineering education in South Africa. This research briefly outlines for South Africa the: a) current performance of the higher education system; b) history of engineering education and c) governance, control and support and efforts to promote industry-educational institutions collaboration. The conclusion drawn is that skills demanded by both the European and American markets are the same skills that are outlined by the South African market economy and are dealt with in full in the SA National Plan for Higher Education and A New Academic Policy for Programmes and Qualifications in Higher Education. Published by Chalmers University as a Research Report, December 2002. Available here through permission of the author. Student
involvment in principled change: Understanding the student experience.
By K. Edström, M. Engström, Å. Wiklund, J. Törnevik The CDIO Initiative is an international collaboration to reform
engineering programs of participating institutions. Student representatives
are actively involved in the process together with faculty and staff.
In order to better represent a majority of students, the student representatives
initiated and carried out a survey of learning experiences among their
peers. In the three participating Swedish engineering programs, students
were interviewed about their study experiences. Presented at the
2003 Improving Student Learning Conference, England. |
|||||||||||||||||||