AAP-Card: An Innovative Method in Teaching and CQI for Large Classes

AAP-Card: An Innovative Method in Teaching and CQI for Large Classes

A. Al-Obaidi (2014).  AAP-Card: An Innovative Method in Teaching and CQI for Large Classes. 13.

Delivering lectures in classes with large number of students is always a big challenge for the lecturers, especially for engineering classes. Checking the attendance, noise, attracting the attention, engaging and motivating the students are only some challenges among many the lecturers face. Such challenges, if are not properly addressed, they may lead to low or poor quality of teaching and delivering the knowledge to the students. This paper shares an innovative method which addresses the above-mentioned challenges by introducing AAP-Card (Attendance-Attention-Preparation Card). Every week, in each lecture session, the lecturer distributes AAP cards to all students. At the end of the lecture or sometimes during the lecture, the lecturer asks question and students need to answer it on the space given for the answer on this card. Another space of the card is for the feedback, where the students write their feedback about the lecture or any other comments. Finally, students need to sign as evidence of their attendance for that lecture session and return the card to the lecturer. Therefore, this card serves many purposes. It saves the time when checking the attendance especially classes with large number of students. It is good tool to check the students’ attention and understanding during the class. Also, and this is the most important purpose, it encourages students to give comments, suggestions, or concern regarding the teaching, learning, facilities, etc. This continuous feedback, if timely and properly addressed, will greatly help in continual quality improvement of teaching and learning. Students also found that AAP card helps them to communicate effectively with the lecturer and this resulted in good and friendly relationship with their lecturer.

Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 15-19 2014

Authors (New): 
Abdulkareem Sh. Mahdi Al-Obaidi
Pages: 
13
Affiliations: 
Taylor’s University, Malaysia
Keywords: 
Large classes
Teaching and learning activities
Lecturing
CQI
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2014
Reference: 
Al-Atabi, M., & Al-Obaidi, A. S. M. (2011). CDIO curriculum for mechanical engineering undergraduate course. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (JESTEC), 6(2), 251–259.: 
Al-Atabi, M., Shamel, M. M., Chung, E. C. Y., Padmesh, T. N. P., & Al-Obaidi, A. S. M. (2013). The use of industrial visits to enhance learning at engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (JESTEC), Special Issue on Engineering Education April (2013), 1-7.: 
Al-Obaidi, A. S. M., Koay, S. L., Chan, Y. M., Tam, S. W., Tan, X. Y., Goh, S. T., & Chan, S. N. (2013). CDIO curriculum for multidisciplinary engineering undergraduate course. International Engineering and Technology Education Conference (IETEC 2013), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.: 
Ammon, H., Sedlacek, W., Goodman, J., Schnell, E., Henretta, A., Testa, B., Mack Jr., M., VanHouten, K., Morstein, J. & Vietri, L. (2006). Large Classes Teaching Guide. University of Maryland. Retrieved January 29, 2014, from http://www.cte.umd.edu/library/teachingLargeClass/guide/index.html.: 
Ammon, H., Sedlacek, W., Goodman, J., Schnell, E., Henretta, A., Testa, B., Mack Jr., M., VanHouten, K., Morstein, J. & Vietri, L. (2006). Large Classes Teaching Guide. University of Maryland. Retrieved January 29, 2014, from http://www.cte.umd.edu/library/teachingLargeClass/guide/index.html.: 
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, the George Washington University.: 
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(2), 3-7.: 
Cooper, J. L., & Mueck, R. (1990). Student involvement in learning: Cooperative learning and college instruction. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 1, 68-76.: 
Crawley, E.F. (2001). The CDIO syllabus: A statement of goals for undergraduate engineering education (MIT CDIO Report # 1). Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://cs.fit.edu/~wds/cdio/CDIO.pdf.: 
Exeter, D. J., Ameratunga, S., Ratima, M., Morton, S., Dickson, M., Hsu, D. & Jackson, R. (2010). Student engagement in very large classes: the teachers’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 761-755. : 
Gibbs, G. (1992). Control and independence. In Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources, ed. G. Gibbs and A. Jenkins, 3759. London: Kogan Page.: 
Lammers, W. J., & Murphy, J. J. (2002). A profile of teaching techniques used in the university classroom: A descriptive profile of a US public university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3(1), 54-67. : 
MQA (Malaysian Qualifications Agency). www.mqa.gov.my. Retrieved January 29, 2014, from http://www.mqa.gov.my/mqr/english/eakrbyipts.cfm: 
Millis, B. J., & Cottell, Jr., P. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx press.: 
Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175-185.: 
O’Moore, L. M., and Baldock, T. E. (2007). Peer assessment learning sessions (PALS): an innovative feedback technique for large engineering classes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 43–55.: 
Schreyer Institute for Teaching Excellence (2007). Large class FAQ: Attendance. Retrieved January 29, 2014, from http://www.schreyerinstitute.psu.edu/Tools/Large.: 
Shamel, M. M., & Al-Atabi, M. (2013). Multidisciplinary projects for second year chemical and mechanical engineering students. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (JESTEC), Special Issue on Engineering Education April (2013), 87-92.: 
Ward, A., & A. Jenkins. (1992). The problems of learning and teaching in large classes. In Teaching large classes in higher education: How to maintain quality with reduced resources, ed. G. Gibbs and A. Jenkins, 2336. London: Kogan Page.: 
Weimer, M.G. (1992). Improving higher education: Issues and perspectives on teaching and learning. In To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional and organizational development, ed. D.W. Wulff and J.D. Nyquist, 1323. Stillwater, OK: New Forum Press, The Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.: 
Go to top