Motivational Factors in Design-Build Projects – Case: Participation in Student Competitions

Motivational Factors in Design-Build Projects – Case: Participation in Student Competitions

J. Roslöf (2013).  Motivational Factors in Design-Build Projects – Case: Participation in Student Competitions. 9.

Often, some engineering students appear not to be as active and motivated as they should be to put enough effort into their studies, that is, to do their homework and attend different teacherfacilitated learning opportunities. Accordingly, course examinations can get delayed from the very beginning. Creating a learning ecosystem in which all students could achieve high intrinsic motivation is a difficult task. Yet, these aspects are of major importance when striving towards a flow-type experience in any learning environment. For example, the following factors are mentioned in literature as motivational drivers in learning settings: reinforcement, relevance, interest, self-efficacy and affect. In this paper, these factors facilitating students’ intrinsic motivation are discussed in general, and in the context of design-build projects in particular. The paper presents how the presence of project stakeholders and customers affects the learning environment and further facilitates motivational drivers. Participation in an international student competition (Microsoft Imagine Cup World Finals) is used as an example to illustrate the elements discussed.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

Authors (New): 
Janne Roslöf
Pages: 
9
Affiliations: 
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Keywords: 
CDIO
collaborative learning
Engineering education
Motivation
projects
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Liimatainen, J.O., Kaisto, J., Karhu, K., Martikkala, S., Andersen, M., Aikkola, R., Anttila, K., Keskinarkaus, P., & Saari, P. (2010). Delayed? Me? – Students’ Thoughts on Delays, Working Life, and Studies in Tertiary Education. Publications of University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland. (in Finnish) : 
Araque, F., Roldán, C., & Saguero, A. (2009). Factors influencing university dropout rates. Computers & Education, 53, 563-574: 
Shuman, L.J., Delaney, C., Wolfe, H., & Scalise, A. (1999). Engineering Attrition: Student Characteristics and Educational Initiatives. Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference ‘99, Session 1430, Charlotte (NC), USA: 
Lim, D. H. (2004). Cross cultural differences in online learning motivation. Educational Media International, 41, 163-173. : 
Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E. & Olkinuora, E. (1998). Expectations and beyond: The development of motivation and learning in a classroom context. Advances in Research on Teaching, 7, 111-150, Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press. : 
Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E. & Kinnunen. R. (2009). Motivation in school from contextual and longitudinal perspective. In M. Wosnitza, S.A. Karabenick, A. Efklides & P. Nenniger (eds.) Contemporary Motivation Research: From Global to Local Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: HogrefeHuber.: 
Young and Hallström (2007). Design-Implement Experiences and Engineering Workspaces. In Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach, 102-129, Springer, USA. : 
Björkqvist J., Roslöf J., and Virtanen S. (2009). ICT Showroom - A Joint Student Project Exhibition and Competition of Three Universities. Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore. : 
Roslöf J., Björkqvist J., and Virtanen S. (2012). Supporting Student Innovation through ProjectBased Learning and Industry Co-operation. Innovations 2012: World Innovations in Engineering Education, pp. 207-215, iNEER, USA. : 
Go to top
randomness