CDIO FACULTY DEVELOPMENT COURSE – BUILT-IN IMPLEMENTATION

CDIO FACULTY DEVELOPMENT COURSE – BUILT-IN IMPLEMENTATION

P. Papadopoulou, K. Bhadani, E. Hulthén, J. Malmqvist, K. Edström (2019).  CDIO FACULTY DEVELOPMENT COURSE – BUILT-IN IMPLEMENTATION. 11.

To successfully implement the CDIO approach in engineering programs, a holistic approach is required, connecting the philosophy of the program with teaching and learning activities in the courses. One influential component in this interaction is faculty members and their competence in providing integrated learning experiences, in using active experiential learning methods, and in assessing student learning (CDIO Standard 10). As an effort to support such faculty development, a group of universities has been conducting activities directly aiming to enable and drive CDIO implementation in the participating universities (mainly within the EIT Raw Materials programme). In this paper, we will continue reporting and critically reflecting on these CDIO-based faculty development endeavours. Initially, a faculty development course was launched in 2016 at Chalmers University of Technology and offered to participants from other universities (Bhadani et al., 2017). The paper starts by outlining the adaptation of the course into its second version, followed by investigating the experiences from the first group in 2018. The course was designed to suit both experienced and novice faculty. It offered a staged introduction to CDIO implementation alternated with sessions in which participants worked on their own course development. The rationale for this design was to increase the direct usefulness for the participants, in that they should feel engaged and involved during learning and be able to immediately apply their learning to their own course. To estimate the impact of the course on participants’ actual course design and implementation, participants’ final presentations and feedback were analysed. Interviews were also conducted to gather information about the changes made in the participants’ own teaching, as well as the perceived influence of the CDIO course on those changes. The paper could be used to support organizers of faculty development courses in other universities, by documenting a model that can be implemented as a standard faculty training course. 

Authors (New): 
Panagiota Papadopoulou
Kanishk Bhadani
Erik Hulthén
Johan Malmqvist
Kristina Edström
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords: 
faculty development
Raw Materials
Course Development
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2019
Reference: 
Bhadani, K., Hulthén, E., Malmqvist, J., Edelbro, C., Ryan, A., Tanner, D., O’Donoghue, L., & Edström, K. (2017). CDIO Course Development for Faculty in Raw Materials Programmes. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary.: 
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5-22. : 
Chuchalin, A., Malmqvist, J., & Tayurskaya, M. (2015). Professional development of Russian HEIs' management and faculty in CDIO standards application. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(4), 426-437. : 
10.1080/03043797.2015.1085837
Clausen, E., Herz, A. C., Sörensen, A. M., Hulthén, E., Papadopoulou, P., Binder, A., . . . Försth, M. (2018). Rethinking Mining Engineering Education - Implementation of Conceive - Design - Implement - Operate (CDIO TM). : 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (2nd ed.)New York: Springer: 
Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Gijselaers, W. H., Moust, J. H. C., Grave, W. S. d., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Vleuten, C. P. M. v. d. (2002). Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research. Medical Teacher, 24(2), 173-180. : 
10.1080/01421590220125277
Edelbro, C., Hulthén, E., Clausen, E., O’Donoghue, L., Herrera, J., Jonsson, K., Bealieu, S., Aldert Kamp, A., & Försth, M. (2017). European initiative on CDIO in raw material programmes. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference. Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary: 
Farmer, E. A. (2004). Faculty development for problem‐based learning. European Journal of Dental Education, 8(2), 59-66. : 
Fullan, M. G. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational leadership, 50, 12-12.: 
Högfeldt, A.-K., Strömberg, E., Jerbrant, A., Berglund, A., Hussmann, P. M., Villadsen, J., Kinnunen, P., Malmi, L., Malmqvist, J., & Baggerud, B. (2013). Program Leadership from A Nordic Perspective – Program Leaders’ Power to Influence their Program. Proceeding of the 9th International CDIO Conference. Cambridge and Massachusetts, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.: 
Loyer, S., & Maureira, N. (2014). A Faculty Teaching Competence Enhancement Model - A Mentoring Approach. Proceeding of the 10th International CDIO Conference. Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.: 
Malmqvist, J., Gunnarsson, S., & Vigild, M. E. (2008). Faculty Professional Competence Development Programs – Comparing Approaches from Three Universities. Proceeding of the 4th International CDIO Conference. Gent, Belgium: Hoogeschool Gent: 
Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015). A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally - Effects on Educational Quality. Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China: Chengdu University of Information Technology.: 
Plain, C. (2007). Build an affinity for KJ method. Quality Progress, 40(3), 88. : 
Todnem By, R. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369-380. : 
10.1080/14697010500359250
Walkington, J. (2002). A process for curriculum change in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 133-148. : 
10.1080/03043790210129603
Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138. : 
10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de
Go to top
randomness